Media discussion - 2024/25

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sir peace frog said:
just about to post that, how that even warrants a mention in the article

Champions Manchester City had the lowest net spend of any Premier League club in the transfer window - actually turning in a £115.8m profit.
They spent £21.4m on Brazil winger Savinho, but selling players such as forward Julian Alvarez and defenders Joao Cancelo and Taylor Harwood-Bellis made it a profitable window.
In fact, none of last season's top three featured prominently when it came to net spend.
Arsenal spent £93.9m - including £38.4m on Italy defender Riccardo Calafiori and £27.4m apiece for Spanish duo David Raya and Mikel Merino - but sold £76.8m worth of players.
Liverpool bought midfielder Federico Chiesa and goalkeeper Giorgi Mamardashvili but selling players such as Fabio Carvalho, Sepp van den Berg and Bobby Clark meant they made a £14.4m profit.
City, of course, have won four successive Premier League titles. They face 115 charges – which they deny – of alleged breaches of the league's financial rules.

​

Click to expand...
And there are some still denying the existence of an agenda……
 
This is from article on the BBC website this morning about the transfer window and specifically about how much the title contenders spent.

You might wonder what is the relevance to the topic

“City, of course, have won four successive Premier League titles. They face 115 charges – which they deny – of alleged breaches of the league's financial rules.”
 
OntarioBlue said:
This is from article on the BBC website this morning about the transfer window and specifically about how much the title contenders spent.

You might wonder what is the relevance to the topic

“City, of course, have won four successive Premier League titles. They face 115 charges – which they deny – of alleged breaches of the league's financial rules.”
Click to expand...
Subtle isn't it? :-)
 
bridgeno1 said:
What a fucking weird Sky interview with Pep.

'Pep will you be queuing up to get Oasis tickets?'

'No I'll be preparing for West Ham'.

'What are your thoughts on the Oasis reunion?'

'(Long, bemused pause). I think it's good for the Oasis fans. (Long pause).'
Click to expand...
Always thought our media department lacked any kind of nouse. When asked stupid questions, pep needs a go to line. Something on the lines of “ next stupid question gets a prize “
 
Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese said:
later on there is probably the clumsiest 115 reference I've ever seen. It's like the editor read the article and decided it needs a 115 sentence randomly shoved in
Click to expand...
It's almost as if the BBC are not actually editorially independent. Who knew this shabby organisation would so wilfully ignore the whole point of its Royal Charter and the reason why it continues to be funded by the public.
 
OntarioBlue said:
This is from article on the BBC website this morning about the transfer window and specifically about how much the title contenders spent.

You might wonder what is the relevance to the topic

“City, of course, have won four successive Premier League titles. They face 115 charges – which they deny – of alleged breaches of the league's financial rules.”
Click to expand...
Said it many times,they need banning from the ground.
Not only have they got our figures wrong as we have raised more than they state but the figure they come up with is net 115.8 million (surprise) there was zero reason to add a reference to charges in this but they seem to shoe horn it into every article they do, it’s clear and organised bias from the the red top loving BBC.
 
eastlandsblue said:
Always thought our media department lacked any kind of nouse. When asked stupid questions, pep needs a go to line. Something on the lines of “ next stupid question gets a prize “
Click to expand...
In defence of our media chap, when that toe rag asked Pep if he'd had back handers like Mancini, he went to stop it dead. Pep interrupted the media guy, said it was OK and answered it.
Our media department are told what their role is. I do not believe they are shit, they simply do as they are told, by Khaldoon, Pep, whoever.
It is clear that orders from above are that we do not take on the press.
 
Blue Mist said:
In defence of our media chap, when that toe rag asked Pep if he'd had back handers like Mancini, he went to stop it dead. Pep interrupted the media guy, said it was OK and answered it.
Our media department are told what their role is. I do not believe they are shit, they simply do as they are told, by Khaldoon, Pep, whoever.
It is clear that orders from above are that we do not take on the press.
Click to expand...
Well if thats the case, we need to stop being pussies. These bellends wouldn’t last two minutes with baconface
 
OntarioBlue said:
This is from article on the BBC website this morning about the transfer window and specifically about how much the title contenders spent.

You might wonder what is the relevance to the topic

“City, of course, have won four successive Premier League titles. They face 115 charges – which they deny – of alleged breaches of the league's financial rules.”
Click to expand...
net spend.JPG
 
Joe Hart interview with Rodri shown on Football Focus today. Also Nedum was a guest in the studio.
The BBC love in with City continues.
 
Blue Mist said:
In defence of our media chap, when that toe rag asked Pep if he'd had back handers like Mancini, he went to stop it dead. Pep interrupted the media guy, said it was OK and answered it.
Our media department are told what their role is. I do not believe they are shit, they simply do as they are told, by Khaldoon, Pep, whoever.
It is clear that orders from above are that we do not take on the press.
Click to expand...
If you read Sorianos book "The goal doesn’t go in by chance" it will tell you all about how we handle the media.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top