Media discussion - 2024/25

manimanc said:
View attachment 139239

Not one mention of the other team being minnows.
All positive.
Beating a no mark team 3-2 is rehashed as it being some edge of your seat thriller.

No mention that the other team went 2-1 up but was expected from red blinkered reporting.

Laughable this latest rag wankfest.
Click to expand...
They have to keep their subscribers happy by pandering to the rags
 
Blue Mist said:
Please don't think it is just us the Telegraph hate.
The online version of this racist rags football section opens with..
'Chelseas Christopher Nkunku more valuable than the entire squads of 30 Europa Conference squads'

He cost £52 million.

When has this shite paper ever said that about the rags ?They've bought a herd of donkeys for the same amount and Anthony, who cost more, can't even get a game.

The rags just about beat a bunch of pig farmers from some former Communist block country and not a word is said against them, certainly not by this racist newspaper anyway.
Click to expand...
Can I do a triple like of this post!?!
 
Blue Mist said:
Please don't think it is just us the Telegraph hate.
The online version of this racist rags football section opens with..
'Chelseas Christopher Nkunku more valuable than the entire squads of 30 Europa Conference squads'

He cost £52 million.

When has this shite paper ever said that about the rags ?They've bought a herd of donkeys for the same amount and Anthony, who cost more, can't even get a game.

The rags just about beat a bunch of pig farmers from some former Communist block country and not a word is said against them, certainly not by this racist newspaper anyway.
Click to expand...
Norway?
 
neel said:


Utter lies again to imply we are state owned.
Click to expand...


The proposed amendment says owned or controlled and defines as "A state-controlled club is one which is wholly or majority-owned by individual(s), entities, or entities controlled by individual(s) who are deemed by the IFR or the secretary of state to be under the influence of any state actor, including but not limited to: members of any government or their immediate family, a head of state or their immediate family, diplomats, lobbyists, or other state representatives, or their immediate family, and sovereign wealth funds.”

That covers City and Newcastle, of course. No-one else.

The article this comes from, however, does state:
"Whitehall insiders insist the chance of the amendment being agreed is small, but some Premier League clubs have previously urged the government to introduce such a ban."
and
"The bill was debated in the House of Lords on Wednesday but peers have yet to discuss Bassam’s amendment."

For those interested: https://archive.ph/HW65E
 
halfcenturyup said:
The proposed amendment says owned or controlled and defines as "A state-controlled club is one which is wholly or majority-owned by individual(s), entities, or entities controlled by individual(s) who are deemed by the IFR or the secretary of state to be under the influence of any state actor, including but not limited to: members of any government or their immediate family, a head of state or their immediate family, diplomats, lobbyists, or other state representatives, or their immediate family, and sovereign wealth funds.”

That covers City and Newcastle, of course. No-one else.

The article this comes from, however, does state:
"Whitehall insiders insist the chance of the amendment being agreed is small, but some Premier League clubs have previously urged the government to introduce such a ban."
and
"The bill was debated in the House of Lords on Wednesday but peers have yet to discuss Bassam’s amendment."

For those interested: https://archive.ph/HW65E
Click to expand...
Ohh ,now I am worried .
 
halfcenturyup said:
The proposed amendment says owned or controlled and defines as "A state-controlled club is one which is wholly or majority-owned by individual(s), entities, or entities controlled by individual(s) who are deemed by the IFR or the secretary of state to be under the influence of any state actor, including but not limited to: members of any government or their immediate family, a head of state or their immediate family, diplomats, lobbyists, or other state representatives, or their immediate family, and sovereign wealth funds.”

That covers City and Newcastle, of course. No-one else.

The article this comes from, however, does state:
"Whitehall insiders insist the chance of the amendment being agreed is small, but some Premier League clubs have previously urged the government to introduce such a ban."
and
"The bill was debated in the House of Lords on Wednesday but peers have yet to discuss Bassam’s amendment."

For those interested: https://archive.ph/HW65E
Click to expand...

Hedge fund purchases are fine where the people who invest in it are allowed to be anonymous is fine then! Shouldn't matter who owns a club if there is rules in place to stop clubs spending what they want!

Of funny that Chelsea a hedge fund club spent over 1b is fine!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.