bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
Lord Bassam was sacked from his job as Chief Whip for fiddling his expenses.Ohh ,now I am worried .
Lord Bassam was sacked from his job as Chief Whip for fiddling his expenses.Ohh ,now I am worried .
Would have a taken a single vote against to remove the amendment apparently - no objectors in the second house. The hate runs deep.Lord Bassam was sacked from his job as Chief Whip for fiddling his expenses.
My 10 year old son could write more factual stories than these. They do know (despite what they think) that legally City are NOT state owned. So why would we need to change ownership?
Utter lies again to imply we are state owned.
Ohh ,now I am worried .
He's worried because he authorised them!!Lord Bassam was sacked from his job as Chief Whip for fiddling his expenses.
Well I'd also question the fact that INEOS regularly receive huge financial support from the UK coffers e.g. only this year they received £700/800m for one of their projects from our government (tax payers). If that money is helping INEOS make more profit, and the rags are receiving funds directly from INEOS, does that not create a link between the rags and state funding?Aah but this time they’ve included every single possible link they can draw. It’s amazing that they don’t realise how influential US billionaires are.
Don't forget the Battle of the Estadio Metropolitano in the CL, where one team wanted to play football and the other just fight - I think we were only ones to be fined that night.Move the goalposts re FFP - Check.
Uefa try to get us banned from Europe - Check.
Premier League fine us countless times for apparently being late for the 2nd half - Check.
Uefa fine us for booing a player - Check
Nostrils harris accuse pep of backhanders on the day we complete the domestic quad - Check
Premier League throw 115 Charges at us - Check
We need to change owners because clubs can't be state owned( even though we aren't state owned) - Check
I'm sure there is a list as long as my arm to do with us and "wrongdoings".