You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Media persecution of Raheem Sterling
- Thread starter Ric
- Start date
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
Some in the comments section of that article weren't hit in back of the head with the sharp end of a pickaxe enough as children.
Wretched Vengeance
Well-Known Member
Sky commentator when Sterling nuts City's third in.
He shouldn't have any fucking critics!
Despite all his critics, Sterling does his talking on the pitch.
He shouldn't have any fucking critics!
blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
Slightly off topic but what a waste of a few hours SPOY is, generally won by whoever the average Tunbridge Wells person votes for.Sports personality of the year tomorrow. From the debate he's raised over the past week alone (nevermind being a centurion and genuinely being a model pro) raheem should have been favourite
The biggest disgrace will no doubt be the team of the year award going to Netball Rather than us.
Well, they are a lot prettier than Eddie.Slightly off topic but what a waste of a few hours SPOY is, generally won by whoever the average Tunbridge Wells person votes for.
The biggest disgrace will no doubt be the team of the year award going to Netball Rather than us.
W
W
worsleyweb
Guest
It will change now.
bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
Somebody else about to go off piste but bear with as I explain the current justification of Raheems allegations against our institutionalised written press.
We all know what he said and what he posted in support which showed how the press report differently on black and white footballers - but he was also alluding to the wider society.
I have heard today how the press seems to have fallen out of love with Meghan ( Markle as was ) and there are claims that in order to make a royal story the press are pitching princess against princess - Meghan vs Kate - with what may or may not be truths about rifts in the Royal household. Now, if you will recall Harry stepped in to rebuff the press when there were stories highlighting his future wife's ethnicity - stamped it down and said he wasn't having racial undertones being raised in his relationship. It seems that, in order to make a story, the press are making one princess the "goody" and one the "baddie" - the baddie being the one who has "joined the firm" and is creating waves. Guess which one is the baddie ? Could it be that the institutional almost unknowing bias have been used in reporting these "stories"? Raheem has more than a point.
We all know what he said and what he posted in support which showed how the press report differently on black and white footballers - but he was also alluding to the wider society.
I have heard today how the press seems to have fallen out of love with Meghan ( Markle as was ) and there are claims that in order to make a royal story the press are pitching princess against princess - Meghan vs Kate - with what may or may not be truths about rifts in the Royal household. Now, if you will recall Harry stepped in to rebuff the press when there were stories highlighting his future wife's ethnicity - stamped it down and said he wasn't having racial undertones being raised in his relationship. It seems that, in order to make a story, the press are making one princess the "goody" and one the "baddie" - the baddie being the one who has "joined the firm" and is creating waves. Guess which one is the baddie ? Could it be that the institutional almost unknowing bias have been used in reporting these "stories"? Raheem has more than a point.
Somebody else about to go off piste but bear with as I explain the current justification of Raheems allegations against our institutionalised written press.
We all know what he said and what he posted in support which showed how the press report differently on black and white footballers - but he was also alluding to the wider society.
I have heard today how the press seems to have fallen out of love with Meghan ( Markle as was ) and there are claims that in order to make a royal story the press are pitching princess against princess - Meghan vs Kate - with what may or may not be truths about rifts in the Royal household. Now, if you will recall Harry stepped in to rebuff the press when there were stories highlighting his future wife's ethnicity - stamped it down and said he wasn't having racial undertones being raised in his relationship. It seems that, in order to make a story, the press are making one princess the "goody" and one the "baddie" - the baddie being the one who has "joined the firm" and is creating waves. Guess which one is the baddie ? Could it be that the institutional almost unknowing bias have been used in reporting these "stories"? Raheem has more than a point.
I never know how to highlight on this place but your second to last sentence 'almost unknowing bias' is in my opinion wrong. They know full well what they are doing. The white DM readers, the Women's Institute and the great church going public also know whose side they are on. Well he should never have married beneath himself and well she's coloured. And this is what infuriates about how the press are now reporting the Raz story. His message has been twisted round to blame society, it has nothing to do with them oh no they just reported facts, us racists are the bad guys.
bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
I never know how to highlight on this place but your second to last sentence 'almost unknowing bias' is in my opinion wrong. They know full well what they are doing. The white DM readers, the Women's Institute and the great church going public also know whose side they are on. Well he should never have married beneath himself and well she's coloured. And this is what infuriates about how the press are now reporting the Raz story. His message has been twisted round to blame society, it has nothing to do with them oh no they just reported facts, us racists are the bad guys.
you get my point though?
you get my point though?
Definitely, I was just being more direct than you. I think they know exactly what they are doing and the quote about the 2 city academy players buying houses for their mums has been ignored as it embarrasses the media.