franksinatra
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 10,670
No point in arguing something we agree on. I also think the CIES index is dubious but that’s only because it firmly sits in the confines of my profession so I am bit more interested in the methodology than most.
That said, I do think there is an agenda (based on many causes, not just ‘the UK media hates us’, mind) and it is more and more difficult to argue against that as time passes and evidence presents itself. And that’s from someone that places a large premium on objectivity and qualitative/quantitative analysis (again, it is my profession).
Fair play to you Sebastian. Been a few years since I tested a null hypothesis or undertook a Spearman rho/Mann-whitney test?
I would be interested to know how the CIES measures players performance accurately, particularly a player like Otamendi who has relatively little to do compared to other centre halfs and so in ‘traditional’ measures like tackles/blocks would undoubtedly compare unfavourably.