Media Thread 2020/21

Status
Not open for further replies.
Keown reacts like a child (as does Wio) about a goal for us, it's all "I don't like the rules, they're stupid".

You don't need much of an imagination to realise that if it'd been a goal against us and Shearer had been in the studio he'd have pulled out his stone-eyes routine and just brushed it off with a "those are the rules, I don't know what all the fuss is about, they need to just deal with it".

There's no bias, of course there's not. ;)
 
It is so simple and basic I just don't get what people,including the so called expert in the media, find hard to understand.
It is not a new rule. It has happened for decades. Plenty of goalkeepers have given away silly goals by miscontrolling the ball while an attacker is trying to block their clearance. In virtually every case there is only one player in front of the attacker (ie the goalie). When this happens the goalie plays the attacker onside. Jesus tries to score like this every match. In fact he tried it last night in the second half. It doesn't make any difference that Rodri has come from behind Mings. Dean Smith made a total fool of himself as did the BT pundits.
 
Last edited:
Don’t know why I do it to myself. Clicked on the BBC website about 5 times in the last 2 years. Just had a look, ‘‘farcical’ Man City goal...’ clicked straight off. A national disgrace that couldn’t report factually and without spin if their jobs depended on it. Vermin.
 
It is not a new rule. It has happened for decades. Plenty of goalkeepers have given away silly goals by miscontrolling the ball while an attacker is trying to block their clearance. In virtually every case there is only one player in front of the attacker (ie the goalie). When this happens the goalie plays the attacker onside. Jesus tries to score like this every match. In fact he tried it last night in the second half. It doesn't make any difference that Rodri has come from behind Mings. Dean Smith made a total fool of himself as did the BT pundits.

Exactly. It's like attackers run their nuts off, closing down keepers for a laugh!
 
It is not a new rule. It has happened for decades. The number of goalkeepers who have given away silly goals by miscontrolling the ball while an attacker is trying to block their clearance. In virtually every case there is only one player in front of the attacker (ie the goalie). When this happens the goalie plays the attacker onside. Jesus tries to score like this every match. In fact he tried it last night in the second half. It doesn't make any difference that Rodri has come from behind Mings. Dean Smith made a total fool of himself as did the BT pundits.

Smith made himself out to be what he was a sore loser, Ming's too. Worse than that he made himself out to be stupid. The fa should throw the book at him for his behaviour and comments and Villa and their shitehouse fans can get to fuck. As for the media I'd expect nothing less from those utter shitehouses where we're concerned and that monkey faced buffoon Keown whining "It might be the law but it's not in the spirit of the game." What does that even mean??? Here's one for all the whining twats. How about asking Smith and the Villa players about that Sheffield United goal that clearly crossed the line last season? Then ask why in the spirit of the game they didn't let Sheffield United score from the kick off, when they clearly saw it was over the line.
 
Listened to talkshite on the way home form work last night to hear the reaction, fair play to goldstein (although it was probably his turn to be that side of the debate) he was arguing with cundy about when is Rodri allowed to rejoin play and when does phase 2 start, he pushed cundy through each step saying is it phase 2 now... All that candy could say was...but it's not fair the rule needs to change. This situation must've cropped up numerous times since the rule has been in place but never questioned before to this degree. BT had 2 ex rags on the panel who thought the goal should not stand, I'm pretty sure that the scum used this rule as a tactic with van horseface I think it was permanently offside and then sneaking back on (unmarked) for phase 2. Either they have very bad memories or they are shite pundits as they don't know the rules.
 
Smith made himself out to be what he was a sore loser, Ming's too. Worse than that he made himself out to be stupid. The fa should throw the book at him for his behaviour and comments and Villa and their shitehouse fans can get to fuck. As for the media I'd expect nothing less from those utter shitehouses where we're concerned and that monkey faced buffoon Keown whining "It might be the law but it's not in the spirit of the game." What does that even mean??? Here's one for all the whining twats. How about asking Smith and the Villa players about that Sheffield United goal that clearly crossed the line last season? Then ask why in the spirit of the game they didn't let Sheffield United score from the kick off, when they clearly saw it was over the line.
That coverage on BT was he worst yet. Hostile towards City from the start to the end. The commentary team were dire, just giggling and swapping childish stories with each other when they weren't willing Villa to win. They couldn't even get the City scorer's name right. It is amazing that someone as stupid as Ferdinand gets a gig on TV. He makes Savage look like a genius.
 
I'm loving this Drama this morning...Experts well fook me it's amazing that of all of the pundits(Apart from maybe 2 ) including ex expert Refs dont know the rules.
If they thought about this for a min they would realise that it has to be that way as every player who was ever off side during a game would in there minds be permanently offside .....
Wish I was in work and not working from home the Dipper/Rags followers will be crying there hearts out in the brew room .
Come on City .
I like the bit about being permanently offside. I suppose it's the natural conclusion if those ignorant of the rules insist that Rodri is offside when he challenges Mings. Then eventually the entire team could be permanently offside and could take no further part in the game. Then the ignorant pundits would complain even more and disappear up their own back sides.
 
That coverage on BT was he worst yet. Hostile towards City from the start to the end. The commentary team were dire, just giggling and swapping childish stories with each other when they weren't willing Villa to win. They couldn't even get the City scorer's name right. It is amazing that someone as stupid as Ferdinand gets a gig on TV. He makes Savage look like a genius.

Him and Owen are dumb and dumber and I agree bt are despicable and even want us to be beaten in the champions league.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.