Mike Cledford
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Jun 2019
- Messages
- 5,248
- Team supported
- Man City
Manchester UnitedSky would have actively encouraged it, also the PL, not because they were looking after football but because they wanted to ensure maximum exposure to kill off any future rivalry to their own brand. In short, they were all in it together because it’s all about the money.
I've just been reading a piece from the Football Supporters Association about pushing Parliament to debate football ownership and 50+1 describing 'a coalition of ex-players, pundits and media figures' (no mention of media companies themselves) and calls on fans to petition for a debate in Parliament.
It describes Neville rather heroically as' former Manchester United defender Gary Neville' and says he is supported by former players Carragher, Ferdinand, Fletcher, Lineker, Redknapp and Micah. I am sure there is a more recent connection l just can't quite remember.
Ratface acknowledges people think he is a twat (my words) in a politicians insincere self deprecating way as he urges fans to listen to him just this one time and sign the petition to 'bring in independent regulation and transparency at the top of the game we all love.
Hurrah for good old Gary!
Where do these people think that giving control to fans will help. How will fans find the billions to buy out the owners, good and bad. To pay for world class players that attract tv audiences and even to pay for repairs and rodent control at Old Trafford? As if these rich men would just give up their investments and hand them over to people like that rag from MUST who has not been to a match for 16 years.
I thought the FSA had more sense but but when they started clamouring for Ratface the Penalty Man to be POTY l started to wonder. As evidence of fan ownership working they give examples of clubs one in the fifth tier and one in the sixth. Perhaps Neville will persuade his employers to cover their games.
