its grim up north
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 2,219
- Location
- Longsight lad exiled to Swinton
- Team supported
- The Fourmidables
You want to go out for a pint with Rooney.Excellent. Ages since I have heard Ena Sharples mentioned!
You want to go out for a pint with Rooney.Excellent. Ages since I have heard Ena Sharples mentioned!
You mean they've squandered all the Kevin Keegan money?Fuckinell, Dipper on now, we have spent the Coutinho money to strengthen where as City spend what they want
:-) :-) :-):-):-)
What's annoyed me about the media whingeing about the penalty incidents is the lack of understanding of how VAR is supposed to work. It's supposed to draw the referee's attention to a "clear and obvious error".
For the Ederson/Odergaard incident, the replays were very inconclusive and therefore it wasn't a "clear and obvious error". Had Attwell given it as a penalty, it most likely wouldn't have been overturned, as (again) it wasn't a "clear and obvious error". None of the twats appear to understand this, making them either totally thick or totally biased.
Bernardo, on the other hand, was clearly caught by Xhaka. In the ground, we all saw that and were astounded it hadn't been given. I didn't see the shirt pull at all but that was completely irrelevant. What is relevant was that Bernie was tripped and the ref missed that, which was a "clear and obvious error".
Rodders should be banned for celebrating now.
On SSN this morning Rob Wotton looks a right scruffy fucker, I’ve seen better dressed Burnley ultras.
I think they do understand the rules, but choose to ignore them when a decision goes in our favour.I think they did understand that on MOTD. But most pundits dont. The clear and obvious error wording is the VAR get out of jail card which is often used to defend poor Ref decisions, in this case however it was used entirely correctly.
Spot on and the elephant in the room,What's annoyed me about the media whingeing about the penalty incidents is the lack of understanding of how VAR is supposed to work. It's supposed to draw the referee's attention to a "clear and obvious error".
For the Ederson/Odergaard incident, the replays were very inconclusive and therefore it wasn't a "clear and obvious error". Had Attwell given it as a penalty, it most likely wouldn't have been overturned, as (again) it wasn't a "clear and obvious error". None of the twats appear to understand this, making them either totally thick or totally biased. It wasn't Attwell's choice to go to the screen or not, it was Moss who made that decision.
Bernardo, on the other hand, was clearly caught by Xhaka. In the ground, we all saw that and were astounded it hadn't been given. I didn't see the shirt pull at all but that was completely irrelevant. What is relevant was that Bernie was tripped and the ref missed that, which was a "clear and obvious error".
What channel is that clown on so I make sure that I don't accidentally tune in to it.Stan Collymore.
Manchester City’s squad depth and finances have certainly provided them a big advantage in the title race, as injuries and COVID cases have plagued Liverpool and the rest of the Premier League.