Media Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pingu the Penguin said:
Not hedged that questionnaire at all, has Nick.

Blimey.

To save him the clicks, here are the Qs:

Q1: All things considered, do you think [OWNER] is doing a good job of running club?
Q2: Is there a particular significant reason for your answer to Q1?
Q3: Among other clubs currently in the Premier League, which owners at ONE CLUB do you think are the most admirable in terms of what they've done as custodians? [LIST OF PREM CLUBS]
Q4: Among other clubs currently in the Premier League, which owners at ONE CLUB do you think have been the worst in the context of the overall health of the game in England? [LIST OF PREM CLUBS]
Q5: Do you think English football should have an independent regulator with powers to ban nation states, sovereign wealth funds or state-backed individuals from owning English football clubs?
Q6: Is there anything in particular you would like to see an independent regulator focus on in regards to club ownership?

Q5 is all he is bothered about. There are so so many issues for an independent regular to think about: financial imbalance between Prem and other leagues, safeguarding of young players, debt, ticket prices, accessibility at football grounds, power of TV (games finishing after public transport home is available), player welfare (heading the ball/dementia, schedule), etc, etc, etc. But only 1 issue gets a look. Funny that
Click to expand...
Just done the villa one. What is reason for order of the teams
 
Blue Llama said:
The problem is he isn't out of there. The rags would love him to start performing. The toffees are no threat to manure but good performances puts his value up and then they can cast in.
Click to expand...
Well, okay, not out of there but the next best thing. Looks very unhappy to me, like his confidence has gone. A return to his homeland may have been best for him. With Everton signing Alli soon after him he could be forgiven for thinking it’s happening all over again.
 
Ghandi's Flip Flops said:
Typical of Harris to go down this route, with a loaded questionnaire to justify his digs at City.

Whereas, over on the Caf they've got a Best/Worst Run clubs in the PL thread , where even they rate City Best run in a lot of their responses
Click to expand...
As soon as MCFC are the team of the day, rags dippers and jealous supporters will vote for us. End of contest! Probably best if City fans ignore it completely.
Transparent public hanging.
 
Pingu the Penguin said:
Not hedged that questionnaire at all, has Nick.

Blimey.

To save him the clicks, here are the Qs:

Q1: All things considered, do you think [OWNER] is doing a good job of running club?
Q2: Is there a particular significant reason for your answer to Q1?
Q3: Among other clubs currently in the Premier League, which owners at ONE CLUB do you think are the most admirable in terms of what they've done as custodians? [LIST OF PREM CLUBS]
Q4: Among other clubs currently in the Premier League, which owners at ONE CLUB do you think have been the worst in the context of the overall health of the game in England? [LIST OF PREM CLUBS]
Q5: Do you think English football should have an independent regulator with powers to ban nation states, sovereign wealth funds or state-backed individuals from owning English football clubs?
Q6: Is there anything in particular you would like to see an independent regulator focus on in regards to club ownership?

Q5 is all he is bothered about. There are so so many issues for an independent regular to think about: financial imbalance between Prem and other leagues, safeguarding of young players, debt, ticket prices, accessibility at football grounds, power of TV (games finishing after public transport home is available), player welfare (heading the ball/dementia, schedule), etc, etc, etc. But only 1 issue gets a look. Funny that
Click to expand...
Anyone with basic experience of designing impartial questionnaires would tell you that’s bollox. Proves nothing other than his bias.
 
3 quarters of the way down the bbc feature entitled:

Transfer window closes: Premier League clubs spend £295m in busy January 2022​

"Liverpool made the biggest signing of the window in England the day before deadline day, with Porto's Colombia winger Luis Diaz joining in a deal worth 45m euros."

Also note Liverpool player not featured in the image. Gotta keep the net spend champion narrative going.
 
madloaf said:
3 quarters of the way down the bbc feature entitled:

Transfer window closes: Premier League clubs spend £295m in busy January 2022​

"Liverpool made the biggest signing of the window in England the day before deadline day, with Porto's Colombia winger Luis Diaz joining in a deal worth 45m euros."

Also note Liverpool player not featured in the image. Gotta keep the net spend champion narrative going.
Click to expand...
We are the net spend champs this window with a surplus of over £30m
 
Pingu the Penguin said:
Not hedged that questionnaire at all, has Nick.

Blimey.

To save him the clicks, here are the Qs:

Q1: All things considered, do you think [OWNER] is doing a good job of running club?
Q2: Is there a particular significant reason for your answer to Q1?
Q3: Among other clubs currently in the Premier League, which owners at ONE CLUB do you think are the most admirable in terms of what they've done as custodians? [LIST OF PREM CLUBS]
Q4: Among other clubs currently in the Premier League, which owners at ONE CLUB do you think have been the worst in the context of the overall health of the game in England? [LIST OF PREM CLUBS]
Q5: Do you think English football should have an independent regulator with powers to ban nation states, sovereign wealth funds or state-backed individuals from owning English football clubs?
Q6: Is there anything in particular you would like to see an independent regulator focus on in regards to club ownership?

Q5 is all he is bothered about. There are so so many issues for an independent regular to think about: financial imbalance between Prem and other leagues, safeguarding of young players, debt, ticket prices, accessibility at football grounds, power of TV (games finishing after public transport home is available), player welfare (heading the ball/dementia, schedule), etc, etc, etc. But only 1 issue gets a look. Funny that
Click to expand...
Maybe, but we fall foul of none of those, not that anyone who follows this arse would know this. Newcastle might fall foul of the sov wealth fund thing.
Despite giving him clicks we should answer that en masse.
Q1. Yes
Q2 Because we care self sustaining
Q3 Brentford
Q4 Rags
Q5 YES. City fans agreeing here would give him a real headache.
Q6. Stop US clubs being domiciled in tax havens.
CALLING ALL TWITERERS.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.