Churchlawtonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Dec 2013
- Messages
- 14,848
They weren't last night, someone changed it to the rags, then it was changed back.
They weren't last night, someone changed it to the rags, then it was changed back.
We do get some unfair jibes and biased coverage in the press but an element of our fanbase have taken that paranoia and insecurity way too far and have become obsessed.
We certainly don't get ignored.
Fuck em. Everyone hated Man United when they were successful. It comes with the territory.
This is where it's catch 22 though isn't it ?? City can't be "worryingly too strong for the competition's sake" while at the same time being brow beaten by the exact same 'journalists' for not having won the said competition ???BBC Sport this morning on the game last night.
"But City were just too strong, some have suggested worryingly so for the competition's sake."
It appears to list differently on mobile phones, but none of them give us any real prominence. Except the BBC.
You want to try a bit harder mateYes I saw that and thought that has to win knobhead of the century for the writer but who is Harry de Cosemo? I tried for an anagram of all the usual suspects without success.
If you take their pre match build up and commentary in isolation you'd be forgiven for thinking that City were the away team.Thought BT we're surprisingly OK last night
So did I. Likewise I generally don't get that would up by the BBC. The media generally fall into two camps:Thought BT we're surprisingly OK last night