Media Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sky sports pre ad break just now “So Manchester City are flying right now, just how do we stop them?”. For those who say there is no agenda please tell me which other teams they refer to this way? The last team hated as much by the media was the defence team at the Nuremberg trials. The presenter has managed to introduce a goal against us, unhappy players in the squad, £100m man on the bench (he’s fucking injured you daft cunts). Edit and now she’s introduced the Pep hasn’t won the CL line, fucking Sly are a disgrace
Didn’t pep say the other day that the harmony in the squad was the best since he’s been here?
 
I know we say it a lot in gest about people being obsessed with us but I genuinely believe that Nick Harris has a pathological hatred of City, our fans and a very unhealthy obsession about the Club, his behaviour is outright weird. He's delved into open football tribalism now: City fans being weaponised bots, any achievement from the club under Mansour is artificial, dull & requires an asterisk etc etc. He's literally a bot who gains his sense of journalistic worth from Liverpool & United fans lapping him up on Twitter, it's all quite sad really.

His essential MO is that any sponsorship we have from Abu Dhabi must be a front for disguised owner investment & therefore we would be a massive loss making organisation without them, essentially any UAE sponsor = not legitimate. Mental. Here's an articulate breakdown of anyone who buys this nonsense:


Some good replies in there from Blues. The GIF though, take a bow Mr Hartley.
 
Got to say my sides are killing me with laughter after reading the latest football news in the mirror. The author Tom Victor( never heard of him) is apparently saying that Pogba is open to switching to City. And he’s saying it’s akin to when Tevez came to us. What a load of twaddle. Made my day that.
 
How's his "research" going ?

He's just released a spreadsheet showing we earned more in sponsorship than Chelsea, Liverpool and Arsenal from 2011 to 2020 and cannot think of any reason why.

Personally I would have thought having 10 seasons in the CL vs 7 for Arsenal, 4 for Liverpool and 8 for Chelsea might be a starting point. Seems like getting all that extra exposure in the sports premier competition could have value, but what do I know?


I suppose as @projectriver has said in the past, these are not financial journalists, they're football journalist or bloggers who've wandered off the path.

They don't actually understand what attracts business to sponsor a club, or what dictates the amount of money one might spend other than some sort of "You were successful in the 90s so you can make money, you weren't so you must make less".

However, there are loads of businesses out there who literally make their living doing valuations on commercial deals, and consulting with businesses to show them where they'd get the most value for money by sponsoring. In fact, when UEFA needed to prove that PSG's sponsorships were not worth their value, they went out and consulted a sports marketing company, Octagon, to determine the value, but oddly enough the journalists never give someone like that a call for help.
 
Rent free Nick you bellend, rent free.

While I'd fully agree with the sentiment of this, it's quite depressing seeing some City fans on twitter make homophobic remarks to Crafton or jokes about Harris' deceased wife.

I know that the replies will be "every fanbase has them" and "Twitter is a cesspit" etc. but it's the main point of contact between these journalists and our fanbase and those interactions with the worst 0.1% is bound to colour their opinion of the entire group.

I don't really thinks there's much we can do to address it other than reporting those comments, but it's very regrettable that it happens.
 
While I'd fully agree with the sentiment of this, it's quite depressing seeing some City fans on twitter make homophobic remarks to Crafton or jokes about Harris' deceased wife.

I know that the replies will be "every fanbase has them" and "Twitter is a cesspit" etc. but it's the main point of contact between these journalists and our fanbase and those interactions with the worst 0.1% is bound to colour their opinion of the entire group.

I don't really thinks there's much we can do to address it other than reporting those comments, but it's very regrettable that it happens.
Yeah that's bang out of order, still stand by what I said though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.