James Gheerbrant (who?!) in the Times, took a swipe at City yesterday by comparing us unfavourably to Shane Warne. He said "Manchester City embody an entirely different, almost opposite, mode of excellence: a team with no outsize individuals, little of that magic charisma; serial winners driven by process, not personality."
He then goes on to describe how we dominate games, using some stats to demonstrate how much better we are at it than "Sir Alex Ferguson-era" rag teams, but says "football was never meant to look like this."
He then has a swipe at Jack; "Grealish was, in many ways, the closest thing English Football had to a Warne; the wildly lovable folk-cherub, with that playfulness, that innate swagger, the ability to bend a game to his will and have fun doing it... yet the player who was perhaps the most compelling in the league last season feels almost irrelevant now; denuded of some vital quality, it feels like we've lost his 'Grealishness'."
He finishes the article by droning on about how our brilliance is impossible not to admire, but is not enjoyable or fun to watch.
Most tellingly, his article is below a 2 page puff-piece with a "Trent" headline; the difference in emphasis is clear and obvious!