TwatDoesn’t matter what we do, it will be an issue for this clown. Tariq is clearly a
is the word you needed here my friend, **** also works but twat for a little bit of variety is better :)
TwatDoesn’t matter what we do, it will be an issue for this clown. Tariq is clearly a
Think it’s when a player is sold at less than his ‘book value, taking into account contract amortisation?
Twat
is the word you needed here my friend, **** also works but twat for a little bit of variety is better :)
Don’t they just sign 35+ year old strikers who are worth Fk all anyway!I dunno why but that made me think of our quiet neighbours.
Every player is technically carried as an asset on the balance sheet with the amount being roughly the transfer fee divided by the number of years on the contract, decreasing over the life of it. If someone gets sold for less than that value at any point (or is say, sent to prison rendering that player worthless) the difference would be a player impairment charge.Does anyone know what 'Player Impairment' is? I was looking for Roque Santa Cruz's name in there but couldn't see him?
Everydays a school day.At the risk of boring you all silly, panjar in Urdu has a variety of meanings, including rib, skeleton and,,,,,er, frame - something which I suspect red shirt client "journalist" tariq panja knows from his time leaking CAS related shit in the service of his scarlet masters.
Panjar also rhymes with kunjar, which again can mean the name of a clan/tribe, gypsy, nomad, tramp.
The definition of kunjar I've grown up with has always been meaning in a derogatory way, basically equivalent to a ****, twat or wanker. QED! ;-))))
I am sure they will report Mendy's leaving as a huge financial loss (probably fair enough in this case though tbh) the biggest transfer bollock of them all, injuries/form and the ensuing court case verdict.Every player is technically carried as an asset on the balance sheet with the amount being roughly the transfer fee divided by the number of years on the contract, decreasing over the life of it. If someone gets sold for less than that value at any point (or is say, sent to prison rendering that player worthless) the difference would be a player impairment charge.
Its a lot more ..more likely to just be short of £2B.I think Swiss Ramble looked at this a bit ago. I think we've earned >£1bn in TV money and prize money in the Sheikh Mansour era, and about 200m in the past year or so
Doesn't have to be a sale, it's used if the actual value of a player becomes considerably and permanently less than his value in the balance sheet carried forward. The balance sheet value is reduced to his actual value. Accounting principle is lower of cost (amortised) or net realisable value.Every player is technically carried as an asset on the balance sheet with the amount being roughly the transfer fee divided by the number of years on the contract, decreasing over the life of it. If someone gets sold for less than that value at any point (or is say, sent to prison rendering that player worthless) the difference would be a player impairment charge.