Is this actually the case. He has been remanded in custody and is therefore unable to fulfil his contract. Tony Adams was paid his wages including bonuses while he was in prison but this was something Arsenal chose to do. A difference with the Mendy case is, of course, that Adams had been tried and found guilty and his contract was void though Arsenal honoured it.We will have to pay him his salary till the outcome of the case but he won't get any bonuses. If guilty of the seven rape charges he will face a very lengthy prison sentence (the maximum sentence for rape is life) and we will terminate his contract. The trial starts on Jan 24 and will undoubtedly dominate the front pages.
In regular life it would be suspended on zero pay as you’re unable to fulfil your contractual employment obligations on remand.I would assume it’s on the innocent until proven guilty principle.
It seems some tosser on Talkshite today called Jack Grealish a moron numerous times.
I would say yes as in innocent until proven guilty.In the media today “He who shall not be mentioned” has had more charges put to him. I was wondering what are the legal implications of his employment, do we still have to pay his salary.
Not necessarily. It would depend on what your contract said. Generally suspension is considered a neutral actIn regular life if would be suspended on zero pay as you’re unable to fulfil your contractual employment obligations on remand.
I would agree and anything other is not innocent until proven guilty.Not necessarily. It would depend on what your contract said. Generally suspension is considered a neutral act
Most of us don't have contracts that would permit getting paid for a year whilst not doing any work because we were on remand.Not necessarily. It would depend on what your contract said. Generally suspension is considered a neutral act
A bit like Jimmy saville calling someone a sex-pest.It was that tosser Jordan so no-one takes it seriously
It wouldn’t be the one who supported Adolf Hitler would it?