Agitatedman69 should do it.You probably need to look at changing your username, mate.
Agitatedman69 should do it.You probably need to look at changing your username, mate.
Or Annoyedman303Agitatedman69 should do it.
Maybe he’s played a very long jokeOr Annoyedman303
Joined a week before the takeover, so I guess he is quite patient!Maybe he’s played a very long joke
Worry not mate. Already have been banned from the Graun, at least twice, half a decade ago, another rags rag; and cNN are conservative nonces network. So I stay away and #buyacoffeeSeems we both dislike the beeb, but you really should give up the guardian and cnn. The red tops can hate who they want but I think Chelsea will be the main opposition we have to worry about.
I'm sure they were mortified when the mirror called Charlie Adam a likely better close season signing than David Silva, or the majority of the media asking who Yaya Toure was. Would anyone outside City even remember these articles a few weeks later?Why would they give a fuck about a press valuation of a player?
Maybe we're having a closing down sale. When transfer market.com value Harry Kane higher than KDB and just £10 million less than much younger Haaland, you can't take anything seriously until a transfer actually goes through.perceived by whom?
Absolutely no club will judge the value of a player by reading The Sun, those articles are purely for fan click bait and as shown by this thread over and over again, it works.The PR team? It's kind of their job.
Squashing rumours, that could potentially damage the selling potential of outgoing valuable assets, is real stuff anyway.
Absolutely no club will judge the value of a player by reading The Sun, those articles are purely for fan click bait and as shown by this thread over and over again, it works.
Unbelievable Jeff.
Not...
Of course it does. Media pours millions into attacking MCFC. Its reverse marketing. The business world has been doing it for decades and some people think it doesn't work? There is now a perception of MCFC but the flipside to this is that most City fans like being the rebel. City grew when we went to Division Two.I'm not sure about that. Part of a player's value lies in his marketability, look at Pogba and our own Jack Grealish. The constant hyping of players by the media and denigration of others does, in my view, effect the value.
This is true. Those who say that relentless negative media campaigns against City and our owner have no impact on our reputation and our business are wrong. For example I believe the last New York City stadium deal was undermined by local anti-arab human rights campaigners. They have a strong lobby in New York City. That remains an issue for CFG.Of course it does. Media pours millions into attacking MCFC. Its reverse marketing. The business world has been doing it for decades and some people think it doesn't work? There is now a perception of MCFC but the flipside to this is that most City fans like being the rebel. City grew when we went to Division Two.
The more water they throw on our fire, the faster we build it but to argue that either method doesn't have an effect is stupid. We have a media thread because pumping huge volumes of negative publicity out there has consequence
The media buried any talk of United paying an agent fee for Pogba too... If I remember rightly, it was denied they paid anything with the media insistent that Juventus had to stump up his fee... however it came out that they did indeed pay up to £19mil as well as Juve paying approx £20mil... it's also said that United have to pay an annual premium of £1mil plus.Off City Media topic.
A prime example of the Rag infested football media in this country.
The Daily United online today.
The headline article.
Haalands wage demands, Raiola's agent fees, and why Chelsea walked away and moved for Lukaku instead.(apparently??)
![]()
A couple of articles down.
No mention of Haaland's wage demands or Raiola's fees.
![]()
Cue another another 12 months of Haaland to United before he signs for Real Madrid.
This is true. Those who say that relentless negative media campaigns against City and our owner have no impact on our reputation and our business are wrong. For example I believe the last New York City stadium deal was undermined by local anti-arab human rights campaigners. They have a strong lobby in New York City. That remains an issue for CFG.
The latest phrase creeping into press conferences and the media (Klopp and Ole have both used it recently) is "We (LFC and MUFC) are a self-sustaining club." That is a line fed in by the Comms team at LFC and MUFC and is designed to damage City as much as possible. It is more nuanced than the "oil money" narrative which doesn't stack up in any case. That phrase has not appeared out of nowhere.
That said we have achieved success in spite of the smear campaigns and will continue to do so if we hold our nerve.
Who sang this?They sang this at Carlisle when I was a kid in the 70's but it went
No one likes us, no one likes us
No one likes us, we don't care!
We are Carlisle, super Carlisle
We are Carlisle, from the North.
Probably true, nobody liked the long journey to Brunton Park on a cold winters night lol
The media buried any talk of United paying an agent fee for Pogba too... If I remember rightly, it was denied they paid anything with the media insistent that Juventus had to stump up his fee... however it came out that they did indeed pay up to £19mil as well as Juve paying approx £20mil... it's also said that United have to pay an annual premium of £1mil plus.
No surprise, the media kept incredibly quiet on that!
Breaking IR35 rules, think I'll report him to HMRC.Sadly, he seems to be doing a good job for the Rags and their PR and media department.
Chief Football Reporter Neil Ashton has left The Sun to become a PR adviser for Manchester United.
His new company is called Ashton Media Group, although Prolific North understands United are currently his sole client.
![]()
Ashton leaves The Sun to become PR adviser for Manchester United - Prolific North
Chief Football Reporter Neil Ashton has left The Sun to become a PR adviser for Manchester United.www.prolificnorth.co.uk
To be fair if that story about Raiola is half true Haaland won't be going anywhere. I don't believe City or United would consider paying sums on that scale to Raiola. It is not just abut the money. In the current climate no football club can afford to risk their reputation by becoming linked on such a scale to a criminal enterprise. Real Madrid who are currently being hammered by the Spanish authorities for tax fraud and other financial issues won't go there either. I suspect, as many have said on here, that Raiola is just too toxic. It looks like Haaland's dad is willing to sacrifice his own son's career to make a financial killing. With City's past FFP issues we just can't get involved in this one which is probably why we have pursued Kane so aggressively.Off City Media topic.
A prime example of the Rag infested football media in this country.
The Daily United online today.
The headline article.
Haaland's wage demands, Raiola's agent fees, and why Chelsea walked away and moved for Lukaku instead.(apparently??)
![]()
A couple of articles down.
No mention of Haaland's wage demands or Raiola's agent fees.
![]()
Cue another another 12 months of Haaland to United before he signs for Real Madrid.