Media Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
Been a avid reader of WSC since the nineties, never been a Utd wank mag so was disappointed to find the current addition having a sly dig about FFP. Spoke of us being "lawyered up" to fight allegations of high sponsorship payments. They would be better employed campaigning against FFP for the ludicrous thing it is, encouraging debt and stopping investment. Without the investment at City and Chelsea we would have one team domination like Germany or a cosy duopoly like Scotland . Shame on you WSC !
 
The woman stood directly next to Logan never stopped looking directly at the camera. The Mrs pointed it out to me. Really strange, looking directly at the camera whenever the other pundits were talking.
Even though someone else was holding the camera she probably thought it still qualifies as a selfie
 
Been a avid reader of WSC since the nineties, never been a Utd wank mag so was disappointed to find the current addition having a sly dig about FFP. Spoke of us being "lawyered up" to fight allegations of high sponsorship payments. They would be better employed campaigning against FFP for the ludicrous thing it is, encouraging debt and stopping investment. Without the investment at City and Chelsea we would have one team domination like Germany or a cosy duopoly like Scotland . Shame on you WSC !
They swallowed the FC Tribute Act kool aid from the start, worse than David Conn
 
What was said?
The gabby Logan Instagram, was fine, except the context of it all changed completely with the use of the word ‘but’.

it became:
‘sadly the first WSL live match on the BBC saw plucky Everton finish 0-4 to free spending City.’

The live commentary was incredibly biased.
City play well - ‘you’d expect that from them’ in deprecating tones.
Everton fluff the odd chance -‘very unlucky for Everton, they almost got back in the game, can they push on’ - in buoyant tones.

The ex Everton keeper co-commentator, I could understand being biased, and she at least did freely admit it. but surely either have a ex City co-commentator as well (or at least a pundit), or are we into the realms of 30 years of the PL co-commentary where the City flag is never waved From game 1.
 
The woman stood directly next to Logan never stopped looking directly at the camera. The Mrs pointed it out to me. Really strange, looking directly at the camera whenever the other pundits were talking.
That was the rag. Probably trained by their PR team to do that.
 
Been a avid reader of WSC since the nineties, never been a Utd wank mag so was disappointed to find the current addition having a sly dig about FFP. Spoke of us being "lawyered up" to fight allegations of high sponsorship payments. They would be better employed campaigning against FFP for the ludicrous thing it is, encouraging debt and stopping investment. Without the investment at City and Chelsea we would have one team domination like Germany or a cosy duopoly like Scotland . Shame on you WSC !
Lawyered up? I suppose they think we should just send staff from the ticket office to represent the club. We all know red top domination is what they really want and they resent having to report on City games in the knock out rounds.
 
Been a avid reader of WSC since the nineties, never been a Utd wank mag so was disappointed to find the current addition having a sly dig about FFP. Spoke of us being "lawyered up" to fight allegations of high sponsorship payments. They would be better employed campaigning against FFP for the ludicrous thing it is, encouraging debt and stopping investment. Without the investment at City and Chelsea we would have one team domination like Germany or a cosy duopoly like Scotland . Shame on you WSC !
I should hope we are lawyered up.

Are you not entertained?
 
I thought it was a dive when he went down because it was delayed. He was only caught a glancing blow but if he had not moved he would have been wiped out hence Utd had possession because of a moment of foul play. I don't think Pogba meant to hurt his opponent but the challenge was reckless. I can get Dean missing it but I don't see how VAR could possibly have missed it especially when Wolves protested.
Dean never missed it. He was starting right at it. Motd2 showed him wincing at it..
 
Dean never missed it. He was starting right at it. Motd2 showed him wincing at it..
Dean was wincing because he immediately knew that after the match he was going to have to reach in his kitbag for the secret referees book of ridiculous and non-believable excuses. The books titled ‘a cheaters guide to officiating in the EPL.’
 
Been a avid reader of WSC since the nineties, never been a Utd wank mag so was disappointed to find the current addition having a sly dig about FFP. Spoke of us being "lawyered up" to fight allegations of high sponsorship payments. They would be better employed campaigning against FFP for the ludicrous thing it is, encouraging debt and stopping investment. Without the investment at City and Chelsea we would have one team domination like Germany or a cosy duopoly like Scotland . Shame on you WSC !

I've subscribed to WSC for years, believe me it's no friend of City. For such a thoughtful mag it purports to see no difference in any of the top six clubs, preferring, in their love of of all things nostalgic, authentic and "real", to adopt a stance of a curse on all their houses, with a double dose curse on City for being both a bloated obscenity and a cheat.

It's f''king annoying and doubly so because they must be aware of what's really going on yet choose to ignore it.

It's getting to the point where I might cancel my subscription, which would be a pity as on so much else they're a good read.
 
Last edited:
Quite interesting at the moment lots of Instagram posts on how little the rags have didn’t compared to other teams us and Arsenal in particular. 1984 thought speak Orwell was right
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top