Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 60,300
No, but thanks for asking.Thank you for your question Alan. We get most of our money from TV you ****. Do you have a problem with that?
:-)
No, but thanks for asking.Thank you for your question Alan. We get most of our money from TV you ****. Do you have a problem with that?
As ever, Samuel nails it. He has absolutely skewered the bent bastards thereMartin Samuel nails it again by saying FSG's ultimate goal was to get the Super League up and running and as thatsfl failed they've decided to fuck off
MARTIN SAMUEL: Liverpool sale nailed on day Super League dreams died
MARTIN SAMUEL: The weak pound, state-owned rivals, the monetisation that is the heart of venture capitalism. Yet, most of all, FSG's choice to sell Liverpool confirms what English football feared.www.dailymail.co.uk
Doubt they’ll ever do it. City have never really used the iron fist approach.I just don't why he does all of them. I know the club is contractually obliged but you could easily send out someone else to do them on a fairly regular occasion without to much grief. Or just give one syllable answers to silly questions and move on to the next question immediately. The club need to take some responsibility also, for allowing it and not protecting him. Clearly set out the rules of engagement to the journalists before the press conference and have a zero tolerance with repeat offenders and fuck them off for 3 or 4 games before they are allowed back in. They would soon get the message.
Thank you for your question Alan. We get most of our money from TV you ****. Do you have a problem with that?
Yeah, every goal, every pass, every save, every tackle, every shot, on or off target doesn't half piss people off! They do get a glimmer of hope with the odd red card and the rather too frequent penalty miss, but I can't remember when the last pen miss was. They'll no doubt have it framed and on the wall!We do it every time we win. We do it every time Pep opens his mouth.
They have a problem with everything!Thank you for your question Alan. We get most of our money from TV you ****. Do you have a problem with that?
I still can’t get why Abramovich was allowed to pump in around 1.5b in soft loans and not be penalised under FFP rules (I know they didn’t exist when he first bought the club). Why did we go through the pain of CAS when all our owners needed to do was put in soft loan money. Same with Chelsea now, debt written off under the acquisition but Chelsea have spent so heavily how are they getting away with it?One thing the Liverpool coverage is overlooking?
Even a buy in stake would not allow the Dippers to spend an extra bean in the transfer market?
That money goes into Henry's pocket, it is not club revenue, for the purposes of FFP?