halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,123
I suppose that is mostly true. People forget that any sport is about competition. I can watch 10 year old football at the kids' school and enjoy it. Or academy football, or women's football. It's the competition between two evenly balanced sides that makes sport interesting.The womens game (In my pov) will be equal to the mens without the pfysical side though. I see it going the direction of tennis where the women are as skilled but less powerful than the men. And there's a lot of intelligence in football, a lot more than previously required and I diont see why this generationn, all growing up playing footy from child to adult will be as good (If not as powerful)_ as the men. ]
Hanging your hat on "women cant beat boys" is just finding any reason to batter it.
But women's football is, and always be, a different sport to men's football. The football intelligence may be coached in, but without the physicality, there will never be an equivalence. As I said, though, that doesn't mean it can't be interesting at a sporting level.
As far as the influx of female pundits and commentators goes, I don't really get it. If we agree women's football is played at a lower level then I don't see how they can add much as experts. In the same way having a third division footballer talking about elite tactics won't add much. That said, I don't really care much as I don't listen anyway and most of the men don't contribute much to my understanding of the game either.
I get all my tactical knowledge right here, on Bluemoon. What more do I need? :)