There's a reason the general public think Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK.
Does anyone actually think that?
VAR have reviewed the footage.Turns out the mayor of Dallas was offside. Penalty to United.
There's a reason the general public think Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK.
Does anyone actually think that?
Apparently casemiro was "phenomenal" yesterday, according to the bbc. How plucky little paupers manchester united managed to overcome the financial and footballing behemoth that is the mighty Reading, I will never know. Surely it is a feat of superhuman achievement.
Exactly, if they werent bothered about the game why not stay home to watch it.Nailed it.
In all the years I've been watching City, I've never known any set of fans (City or opposition fans) to say they're happy to lose a match, particularly a set of fans who made a 400 mile round trip to see a night match.
I've done trips like that and seen us lose and can't say I've been happy about the result.
Me thinks the Tarquins are chatting shit
Aye. The killer does not know much about football either poor sod.Ah, but that's what they want you to think .......
BBC
'PHENOMENAL
CASERMIRO HELPS
MAN UTD SEE OFF
READING'
Fucking Reading you utter plebs lol
Edit been done already, sorry :)
He Was born in StyalWas, he even pretty much confirmed that last night in his commentary, his family though are still match going Blues apparently , they need to get a grip and give him a bit of a slap though imo.
Or ‘prostitutes’ as they were known at the timeSomeone who didn’t like Victorian prostitutes.
It's not telling at all. If you state that you don't believe LHO was the guilty party, you are saying that the reams of evidence to the contrary are false, the investigations that concluded he was are false and that there was a conspiracy to a) commit the crime and b) blame LHO, whilst c) shielding the real perpetrators. You believe in a conspiracy for which all theorys so far have been disproved, and there remains no credible evidence. The murder of LHO is separate and aside. It's likely that the facts are as stated, but of course its possible that there's more to it.Telling that you keep conflating 9/11 and JFK, and addressing the conspiracy theories (of which I’ve espoused none) and have raised the non-sequitur of the CAS verdict, without dealing with the murder of LHO and the doubt that must cast upon his guilt.
Are you sure that Jack Ruby was simply upset at the assassination of JFK some 48 hours earlier, and just got ‘lucky’, or do you accept there could be another explanation?