Media thread 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not linking it but the mirror did a comedy article about Man City struggling to be in top 4 if you adjust the league table without Erling haaland’s goals :-
Wonder how we managed to score 93 goals in the league last year?(8 more than this season so far).
Oh that’s right we still had 11 men on the pitch at the start of every game. Fuckwits!
 
Not linking it but the mirror did a comedy article about Man City struggling to be in top 4 if you adjust the league table without Erling haaland’s goals :-)

Wonder how we managed to score 93 goals in the league last year?(8 more than this season so far).
Oh that’s right we still had 11 men on the pitch at the start of every game. Fuckwits!
We've been top PL scorers for the past few seasons (can't be arsed checking how many). I had a very quick look and wondered why they never included a comparison with the rags without Shrek or horse-face's goals, or the dippers without Salah's goals in 2019-20.
 
According to the BBC De Bruyne still needs a "legacy moment" to prove himself whatever the fuck that means but in the same article they claim Vinicius Jr is already the best in the world ...
Well that’s ok then we obviously are the underdogs tonight and Madrid should be winning through,anyone actually think if this was any (not just the rags or red scousers) other English team these types of articles would be the complete opposite,English media desperate to see English football team fail ..
 
Of course the rags are top of the headlines today when we play our Semi final, of course it isn't by accident the red mardarses release this statement about king Jism buying the pricks, of course the media will portray it in a positive manner and make out it's all above board and gravy.

Listen, every man and his dog know how these red gobshites operate, take the headlines every chance they can, and of course the thickos in the British press lap it up.

Fuckin hilarious how they are still trying to keep themselves relevant.
 
Of course the rags are top of the headlines today when we play our Semi final, of course it isn't by accident the red mardarses release this statement about king Jism buying the pricks, of course the media will portray it in a positive manner and make out it's all above board and gravy.

Listen, every man and his dog know how these red gobshites operate, take the headlines every chance they can, and of course the thickos in the British press lap it up.

Fuckin hilarious how they are still trying to keep themselves relevant.

Swales used to just sack our manager to get top of the headlines back in the day
 
Sam Wallace had fuck all to say about Abramovic and Gazprom funding fucking Chelsea to unprecedented levels did he the ****. Thats also a fossil fuel, how fucking inconvenient. He can fuck off.

Banging on about our owner only attending one match?

Someone should let him know his other company assets make the City Group look like a corner shop in comparison to Walmart. Not withstanding the pain in the arse of the security necessary for visiting royal dignataries. I'm sure he's aware of not creating any issues for the team and management in the build up for games. He's obviously trying to make out he doesn't give a fuck really to feed the state backed bollox and quantifies it by "we all have our own opinions on that" referring to SM as sole owner. Yet fails to outline exactly what those opinions are, the melt.

The whole thing was yet another negative hit piece, all about the "charges" and even quoting Peps statement about "exceptional legacy" in a demeaning way, as if to imply largesse and arrogance when it was clearly said tongue in cheek as demonstrated by the accompanying journos laughing.

The lead mouthpiece even managed a "not won it without Messi, Xavi and Iniesta, the best team ever" as another put down.

Make no mistake these cunts are already demeaning and painting any potential treble achievements as tarnished by the allegations.

I truly fucking hate them all.

Wants it all ends up, which exposes cunts like him.

In one sentence, saying our owner Sheikh Mansour has only attended one game (that he knows of)

In another sentence, we are owned by a Fossil Fuel state.

Both are meant to denigrate, but let's not allow the contradictions get in the way of another good smear job!

Contrast and compare the narrative about a guy from Qatar who just happens to be about £4bn short in his personal finances...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.