Media thread 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
There’s been talk over a media-agenda towards us for years. The constant snipes, accusation, wrong doings, etc by journalists and pundits (coincidentally all related to the former so called top 4). It’s been going on for so long that people simply have been brainwashed.

And today it shows it’s not over at all. The headlines yesterday evening couldn‘t pass the brilliant achievements by City vs Real. But today it was trying to get the club down asap. Loads of the topics weren’t related to yesterdays game or were pointing at the negatives during the match. Obviously the numerous charges were brought up again.

If people like to think there is still no agenda please do. You are free to think there isn’t one. Happy to agree to disagree. From what I got today it was just shameless. And It will be like this for the next few weeks in case we are able to win the treble. And after that for sure It will continue.
 
Benzino said:
Historically in PL transfers, the highest fees on average should sit around 10% of the total league spend for the year. This rule has remained quite consistent throughout the PL era. It also gives a good indication as to what players from the past would’ve roughly cost today, and also how expensive a top player actually should be in the current market climate right now. For example, last year, the league spent around, a combined £860M, the top signings Nunez was £85M, so 10% of the total spend, and Anthony £90M just over 10%.

To give you some context from the past, in 1993 Utd broke the British transfer record fee for Roy Keane at around £4M. The entire league spent just over £60M that year, so this deal was 8% of the total spend. It was a record at the time, but it wasn’t crazily over the mark.

In 1994 a year later, Utd broke the record transfer again for Andy Cole, this time for nearly double the amount of Keane, at around £7M. But the entire league spent more, and this one deal worked out at around 10% of the total leagues spend.

In 1995, Arsenal broke the record with the signing of Bergkamp for £7.5M, which was at 9% of the total. Liverpool then broke that record shortly after, with the signing of Collymore for 8.5M, which came in at 11% of the total.

In 1996, Newcastle bought Shearer for a British and world record fee of £16M. The league spend was around £100M in total, so this was a deal on the higher end, at about 16% of the total spend.

In 1997, Utd bought Henning Berg for 7.5M, which was nearly half the record price at the time, and it worked out at 5% of the total league spend. Chelsea and Aston Villa had the highest individual transfers of the season, with Greame Le Saux going to Chelsea, and Stan Collymore going to Aston Villa, both worked out at 10% of the total league spend.

In 1998 Utd signed Yorke for a fee of £18M, it was record money for the time, and it was around 9% of the total league spend.

In 2001 Utd got Veron for a record fee of £28M, it was a high price, and it was around 14% of the leagues spend at the time.

In 2002, Utd broke the record fee again with Ferdinand for £30M. The spend was slightly lower this year for several reasons, but this figure equated to 25% of the leagues total spend, which is the highest ever %. It was was a ridiculous figure at the time for any player, especially a CB. To put it in perspective, anyone thinking Enzo Fernandez was expensive, he came in at around 12%.

In 2003, they bought C.Ronaldo for £13M. We are told to marvel at the bargain price for the then 17 year old. But this was actually still 9% of the total spend that year. So it was still a high signing.

In 2004, they got Rooney for nearly double Ronaldo’s price at £30M, and that equated to double the spend %, coming in at 20% of the total league spend. Again, it’s at the very higher end of the scale, and suggest Utd could afford to pay double what they should to get him.

In 2006 they weren’t the top spenders, but they still bought Michael Carrick in at 10% of the total league spend.

I stopped looking at this point and instead looked at our own transfers to see how we faired with comparison to the league spend, this is what I saw:

Grealish -14%
Dias - 11%
Mahrez - 11%.
KDB -10%
Dzeko - 10%
Aguero - 9%
Sterling - 9%
Yaya - 9%
Robinho - 8%
David Silva - 8%
Tevez - 5%

Seems like we’re pretty good at getting players for fair market prices.
Click to expand...
Excellent post. Factual and researched
You’ll never work in journalism
 
oakiecokie said:
I always remember Glyn Pardoe telling me about a Wythenshawe lad who was on our books. They went to his house hoping to complete the deal and suprise surprise outside his house was a spanking brand new Escort XR ?? Glyn and whoever was with him thought it belonged to someone just visiting.
Unfortunately he had signed for the Rags and yep they had bought him the car.
Glyn wouldn`t tell me the name of the young player.
Click to expand...
There's also the case of Peter Lorimer. Around 1960 Lorimer was due to sign for Leeds but the rags, with Busby's knowledge, offered his dad £5,000 to sign for them. Back then that was equivalent to about 10 years' average industrial wage. I believe he took it but young Lorimer himself wasn't happy, the money was returned and he signed for Leeds.
 
Benzino said:
Historically in PL transfers, the highest fees on average should sit around 10% of the total league spend for the year. This rule has remained quite consistent throughout the PL era. It also gives a good indication as to what players from the past would’ve roughly cost today, and also how expensive a top player actually should be in the current market climate right now. For example, last year, the league spent around, a combined £860M, the top signings Nunez was £85M, so 10% of the total spend, and Anthony £90M just over 10%. Enzo Fernandez came in at about 12%.

To give you some context from the past, in 1993 Utd broke the British transfer record fee for Roy Keane at around £4M. The entire league spent just over £60M that year, so this deal was 8% of the total spend. It was a record at the time, but it wasn’t crazily over the mark.

In 1994 a year later, Utd broke the record transfer again for Andy Cole, this time for nearly double the amount of Keane, at around £7M. But the entire league spent more, and this one deal worked out at around 10% of the total leagues spend.

In 1995, Arsenal broke the record with the signing of Bergkamp for £7.5M, which was at 9% of the total. Liverpool then broke that record shortly after, with the signing of Collymore for 8.5M, which came in at 11% of the total.

In 1996, Newcastle bought Shearer for a British and world record fee of £16M. The league spend was around £100M in total, so this was a deal on the higher end, at about 16% of the total spend.

In 1997, Utd bought Henning Berg for 7.5M, which was nearly half the record price at the time, and it worked out at 5% of the total league spend. Chelsea and Aston Villa had the highest individual transfers of the season, with Greame Le Saux going to Chelsea, and Stan Collymore going to Aston Villa, both worked out at 10% of the total league spend.

In 1998 Utd signed Yorke for a fee of £18M, it was record money for the time, and it was around 9% of the total league spend.

In 2001 Utd got Veron for a record fee of £28M, it was a high price, and it was around 14% of the leagues spend at the time. In todays market, that works out at about £120M

In 2002, Utd broke the record fee again with Ferdinand for £30M. The spend was slightly lower this year for several reasons, but this figure equated to 25% of the leagues total spend, which is the highest ever %. It was was a ridiculous figure at the time for any player, especially a CB. To put it in perspective, 25% today would cost you £215M

In 2003, they bought C.Ronaldo for £13M. We are told to marvel at the bargain price for the then 17 year old. But this was actually still 9% of the total spend that year. So it was still a high signing, today it would be £80M for a relatively unknown teenager from Portugal.

In 2004, they got Rooney for nearly double Ronaldo’s price at £30M, and that equated to double the spend %, coming in at 20% of the total league spend. Again, it’s at the very higher end of the scale, and suggest Utd could afford to pay double what they should to get him.

In 2006 they weren’t the top spenders, but they still bought Michael Carrick in at 10% of the total league spend.

I stopped looking at this point and instead looked at our own transfers to see how we faired with comparison to the league spend, this is what I saw:

Grealish -14%
Dias - 11%
Mahrez - 11%.
KDB -10%
Dzeko - 10%
Aguero - 9%
Sterling - 9%
Yaya - 9%
Robinho - 8%
David Silva - 8%
Tevez - 5%

Seems like we’re pretty good at getting players for fair market prices.
Click to expand...
Great post. Love this type of stuff. Add the years to the city signings? A few signed together i think
 
PoorTom said:
Here we go. The Guardian is on it. Only pure bile will come out of this.

Click to expand...

We asked 100 people what they thought of Manchester City. You said "best team in the land and all the world". Our survey says "bald fraud oil cheat state owned gay hating bearded dirty Arab grinning no one cares plastic club with no fans".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.