bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
In his defence, having seen the full interview, Pep stressed twice "if the claims are true" but as usual, his comments were distorted. I agree though with your broad point that we have been much too passive as a club. In recent weeks both Neville and Carragher have used the precise phrase "City owned by a state." That is actually something they usually avoid saying directly. It's a lie and has been proven to be one.He’s given them the opportunity to misquote what he said and present those Hillsborough chants as established fact. If the club want to fight this war in a supine way that’s their business, but they have a duty of care to protect us supporters when the need arises, which they have plainly and pitifully failed to do on this occasion.
I feel very let down.
When you say City are "owned by a state" you are saying we have published false accounts for the past 13 years. We have one majority owner and two other co-owners. The club's structure is totally different to PSG and Newcastle. So when they say this they are suggesting that Sheikh Mansour can't possibly have his own wealth and investment strategy. The narrative is clear: "He's an Arab. They are all the same. You can't trust them." But Neville and Carragher have not been challenged. They would not say this about Russian or Chinese owners of football clubs.