Media thread 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
The fail are looking forward to City's game tonight, about the 50th story down you get Pep's pre match comments. These are as bitter as they come about us

Do you go looking for City stories ?

Personally havent read a paper for a good decade same goes for sports radio and TV.

I just sit back and enjoy City I dont need those knobheads writing and talking shit to spoil my life !
 
Do you go looking for City stories ?

Personally havent read a paper for a good decade same goes for sports radio and TV.

I just sit back and enjoy City I dont need those knobheads writing and talking shit to spoil my life !

Agreed.

The record books will show how many trophies, how many wins and goals, Peps/City's influence on English football, etc.

Not how many articles are written and where they are placed.
 
Can’t do links or attachments but looking at the Guardian web site it would appear that fault can now be found with the club badge.

(And the United one as well)

Oh well best not buy the 2023/24 home shirt.
 
From what I can see no mention of tonight’s game on either The Times or Telegraph online publications. It’s not a coincidence.
 
Do you go looking for City stories ?

Personally havent read a paper for a good decade same goes for sports radio and TV.

I just sit back and enjoy City I dont need those knobheads writing and talking shit to spoil my life !
Precisely, I get most of my City news from the club, fan pages on FB and of course here. I do check out the BBC and Sky sports pages but never read a newspaper and I don't do twitter. Easy peasy.
 
Think Klippetty has copied Pep, with "Trent" playing in front of their now, back 3 alongside Fabinho. Against Leeds, last night, he played in this role.
Apparently, according to the Scouse Spitter, TAA is already on a par with Kev, who plays in a completely different position ?
Think Sky are losing all their credibility with Carragher commenting on his beloved, LFC.
His refusal to acknowledge that TAA deliberately elbowed the ball forward last night with LFC's first goal, is just laughable.
I would not think of subscribing to Sky with their obsession of the Red Shirts duo and their Rat & Spit fan-boys...
Sky will pass it off as klopp reinventing the wheel, they will dress it up, like they're doing now, with bells and whistles and shout it from the rooftops.
It's like when the rags womens team started out in the championship, sky had everyone believing that womens football started then, the big announcement, the media coverage, they was indirectly saying utd had help promote womens football.

The giddyness and rush to roll these two red turds in glitter is sickening.
 
Precisely, I get most of my City news from the club, fan pages on FB and of course here. I do check out the BBC and Sky sports pages but never read a newspaper and I don't do twitter. Easy peasy.

When City beat Bayern three nil last week, you don’t need to go looking at The Mail or Sky sports news to understand how City played. I can see with my own eyes that we played them off the park and don’t need the opinion of some City hating journo to tell me otherwise.
 
Immaculate timing release of an interesting piece , but loaded with negatives, as ever…

Also, he touches on Plymouth also having a ship on their badge ‘celebrating’ the Mayflower and pilgrims, but entirely misses pointing out the issue of commemorating the radical religious intolerants it was carrying to find a new home where they could impose their draconian religious way of living, without ‘interference’.
 
Why do the club still let lying twats like these two shitmunchers on their property? I’ve said it before - as much as it pains me to admit it, Ferguson never stood for shit like this and he was right in standing up to the media and defending his club.

I thought that with Kloss gone City might employ a PR person with some backbone but very little seems to have changed.

ecc1cc1f5d5862a66bd3ab45efc36682.jpg
 
Last edited:
Immaculate timing release of an interesting piece , but loaded with negatives, as ever…

Also, he touches on Plymouth also having a ship on their badge ‘celebrating’ the Mayflower and pilgrims, but entirely misses pointing out the issue of commemorating the radical religious intolerants it was carrying to find a new home where they could impose their draconian religious way of living, without ‘interference’.
United get a very small spattering of a mention. Why? Because he’s a ‘city fan’ man and boy.
 
Why do the club still let lying twats like these two shitmunchers on their property? I’ve said it before - as much as it pains me to admit it, Ferguson never stood for shit like this and he was right in standing up to the media and defend his club.

I thought that with Kloss gone City might employ a PR person with some backbone but very little seems to have changed.

ecc1cc1f5d5862a66bd3ab45efc36682.jpg
NH & MD are part of the Goofycracy
 
Can’t do links or attachments but looking at the Guardian web site it would appear that fault can now be found with the club badge.

(And the United one as well)

Oh well best not buy the 2023/24 home shirt.
What an absolute load of bollocks.
Hattenstone portrays himself as a City fan as well.
I am proud of Manchester‘s , heritage leading the way with the Industrial Revolution. If my understanding is correct didn’t we also have history of supporting the abolition of slavery In America.
The line about the golden eagle on the badge had a “whiff of Nazism”.
Fucking disgraceful journalism.
 
Looking forward to this country's media fully getting behind it's only representative left in the Champions League.


Like fuck i am, lets win it and really have a party and then listen to months of piss boiling from the sad twats
Yes the BBC have two City headlines
How shit is Eddy ? However you have to read it further down for balance.
Great CL comebacks -again
What a shitpit of an organisation pandering to the Red tops.
 
Last edited:
Yes the BBC have two City stories
How shit is Eddy ? However you have to read it further down for balance.
Great CL comebacks -again
What a shitpit of an organisation pandering to the Red tops.

The Ederson piece is a misleading headline, but the piece is in the name of Karen Bardsley, and it largely defends Ederson and explains that the bare stats don't tell the whole story.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top