Media thread 2022/23

[give it to gordon]

Media seems to be full on knocking City this morning and last night. Dave jones on sky must have had on a WHU kit on under his coat. Tyler and Neville worst I have heard, Neville wanting our players booked after every tackle !

From what I have read on hear we certainly are boiling alot of piss lol

 

[jim tolmies perm]

Nick Harris ghost writing for MEN now?

Whoever it is he's clearly a **** or a rag or probably both

 

[Inter Me Nan]

Ah yes the bitter scouser talking shite again.

Another nobhead given airtime when in reality he should be stacking shelves in a supermarket.

Wouldn't even have him doing that!

 

[give it to gordon]

What the press/media are forgetting about Haaland when comparing him to ex players is VAR.

Van Nistelrooy, Rush, etc etc how many of their goals would have been ruled out by VAR ? Van Nistelrooy would only have about 5 goals if VAR was around back than !.

All Haaland goals are 100% legal goals something you cant say about strikers before VAR

 

[the-ecstacy-of-eight]

Is this the same geezer who nearly mounted Gary Neville in the studio on Derby Day in 2017 when Rashford scored for the rags when we beat the 2-1 at theirs?
He seems like the class creep you had at school, the one always running off to tell the teacher.

Last night's coverage was a sham, cissy and ada on comms willing west ham to score, this prick talking out of his arse, what do you expect with the bitter pricks at sky.

That's brilliant mate :D

 

[Goodlove]

Accord to Jonathan Liew in The Guardian

"Haaland is a lavish gamble which has paid off for City"

And

"Phil Foden has found himself marginalized this season due to Haaland "

That article was so bitter, you could feel him typing it through gritted teeth. It took him about 4 lines to mention Abu Dhabi and then a few more to mention that we spend spend spend.

 

[kippaxwarrior]

Ah yes the bitter scouser talking shite again.

Another nobhead given airtime when in reality he should be stacking shelves in a supermarket.

Foden has been so marginalized this season he's only appeared for us 45 times and has been involved in 22 goals and assists

 

[madloaf]

Accord to Jonathan Liew in The Guardian

"Haaland is a lavish gamble which has paid off for City"

And

"Phil Foden has found himself marginalized this season due to Haaland "

How can someone write this in all seriousness and dare to call themselves a football journalist: "Swap Haaland for Weghorst – and leave everything else unchanged – and City are out of the title race by Christmas. They’re 12th by the time the season pauses for the Qatar World Cup, with even Champions League qualification a remote object on the horizon. They lose against Newcastle and Crystal Palace and Aston Villa, draw with Manchester United and Brighton and Fulham. Guardiola’s future is being called into question long before the late-spring rally that helps them recover to seventh place and a tilt at the Europa Conference League".

How many goals did haaland score in the previous 5 seasons where we won fucking 4 premier leagues and a never done before never done since domestic treble?!?

He then goes on about city being machine-like, soulless, machine-like, soulless. The stick they keep trying to beat us with. These fucking articles are the only soulless machine-like things around here.

Fucking hate them all. To be this fucking bitter...Jesus Christ I wish they'd all fuck off...actually I prefer them to stay and watch us destroy the hopes and dreams of the teams they love.

 

[tommybooth]

Sounds like a small cock.

 

[Chappie]

The more negative the articles become, the happier I am.
It means we are on the verge of winning another trophy.

 

[NJMCFC184]

Accord to Jonathan Liew in The Guardian

"Haaland is a lavish gamble which has paid off for City"

And

"Phil Foden has found himself marginalized this season due to Haaland "

Same dickhead who said it'd get boring all the goals he's scoring.

 

[Pontypool Blue]

It's easy this Chat GPT - makes numpties like me appear to be smart:
In 2019, Standard Chartered Bank, a British multinational banking and financial services company, was fined £102 million by the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) for serious breaches of anti-money laundering (AML) regulations. The FCA found that the bank had failed to adequately detect and prevent money laundering and terrorist financing, and had also breached sanctions regimes in multiple jurisdictions.

One notable aspect of the case was the involvement of Liverpool Football Club. Standard Chartered had been the club's main sponsor between 2010 and 2019, and during this time, the bank had processed hundreds of millions of pounds in suspicious transactions related to the club's transfer deals. The FCA found that the bank had not properly investigated these transactions, which included payments to offshore companies and individuals with no clear link to football.

Liverpool FC was not accused of any wrongdoing in the case, but the revelations were nevertheless embarrassing for the club, which prides itself on its strong ethical and community values. In a statement, the club said that it was "deeply disappointed" by the findings and that it had conducted its own review of its financial systems and processes.

Standard Chartered, for its part, acknowledged the seriousness of the breaches and said that it had taken steps to address the issues identified by the FCA. The bank had also cooperated fully with the investigation and had agreed to pay the fine without contesting the FCA's findings.

The case highlighted the importance of AML regulations and the need for banks and other financial institutions to be vigilant in detecting and preventing money laundering and terrorist financing. It also served as a reminder that even reputable organizations can fall foul of these regulations if they do not have appropriate systems and processes in place.

In conclusion, the Standard Chartered money laundering case was a significant event that had implications beyond the banking sector. While Liverpool FC was not directly implicated in the wrongdoing, the revelations were nevertheless a reminder of the importance of transparency and ethical behavior in all aspects of business and finance

 

[chris85mcfc]

Tyler was a disgrace last night, just comes across as a snide with his comments. Him and Neville were desperately trying to make something of this title race, and almost going as far as saying that West Ham had found a way to stop us.

Didn't even have anything prepared to describe Haaland after scoring his 50th goal.

Peter Drury on the other hand always seems to have the words to describe the moment, I just hope he doesn't end up at Sky where he'll probably be advised on what he can and can't say depending on which club is playing.

 

[Gorton_Tubster]

Not sure how you guys are finding all this negative shit, it's a lovely blue morning and the media are singing our praises, especially Haaland.

 

[waspish]

It's easy this Chat GPT - makes numpties like me appear to be smart:
In 2019, Standard Chartered Bank, a British multinational banking and financial services company, was fined £102 million by the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) for serious breaches of anti-money laundering (AML) regulations. The FCA found that the bank had failed to adequately detect and prevent money laundering and terrorist financing, and had also breached sanctions regimes in multiple jurisdictions.

One notable aspect of the case was the involvement of Liverpool Football Club. Standard Chartered had been the club's main sponsor between 2010 and 2019, and during this time, the bank had processed hundreds of millions of pounds in suspicious transactions related to the club's transfer deals. The FCA found that the bank had not properly investigated these transactions, which included payments to offshore companies and individuals with no clear link to football.

Liverpool FC was not accused of any wrongdoing in the case, but the revelations were nevertheless embarrassing for the club, which prides itself on its strong ethical and community values. In a statement, the club said that it was "deeply disappointed" by the findings and that it had conducted its own review of its financial systems and processes.

Standard Chartered, for its part, acknowledged the seriousness of the breaches and said that it had taken steps to address the issues identified by the FCA. The bank had also cooperated fully with the investigation and had agreed to pay the fine without contesting the FCA's findings.

The case highlighted the importance of AML regulations and the need for banks and other financial institutions to be vigilant in detecting and preventing money laundering and terrorist financing. It also served as a reminder that even reputable organizations can fall foul of these regulations if they do not have appropriate systems and processes in place.

In conclusion, the Standard Chartered money laundering case was a significant event that had implications beyond the banking sector. While Liverpool FC was not directly implicated in the wrongdoing, the revelations were nevertheless a reminder of the importance of transparency and ethical behavior in all aspects of business and finance

Maybe someone will bring out a new paper and online news out all from using that tool! And could be run by 1/2 People! It’s unbelievable what it can do and we in the really early stages of it!

 

[laserblue]

Accord to Jonathan Liew in The Guardian

"Haaland is a lavish gamble which has paid off for City"

And

"Phil Foden has found himself marginalized this season due to Haaland "

If he thinks that Haaland is a "lavish gamble" at £51 million what does he class £85 million Darwin Award Nunez as?

 

[JASR]

Not sure how you guys are finding all this negative shit, it's a lovely blue morning and the media are singing our praises, especially Haaland.

I think that’s the point in highlighting the guardian article.
It is, correctly, a sea of Haaland blue ink, and then…

 

[JASR]

If he thinks that Haaland is a "lavish gamble" at £51 million what does he class £85 million Darwin Award Nunez as?

He didn’t. Though He said Nunez was £64m!

 

[Wardley Blue]

The more negative the articles become, the happier I am.
It means we are on the verge of winning another trophy.

It also shows how much pain they are in. Long may it continue. Happy days.

 

[laserblue]

He didn’t. Though He said Nunez was £64m!

It was a rhetorical question mate. Liew is too stupid to let facts to get in the way of his bitter bullshit :-D