Blue Llama
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 May 2009
- Messages
- 5,414
Anyone else bored with this now?
You saying it's only a matter of time before we see academy players in the first team?Yep, and yet some on here still miss the point. Patience is a virtue.
Rashford only got in by necessity and from what I've been told by rags i know, wasn't even the 3rd best player
in his youth group.
I think foden is one of the best iv seen at that level. Could see Maffeo and Garcia being 1st team squad regulars as well. It is difficult in the cash rich premier league to put youngsters straight in but my point is that mourhino will not play youngsters unless he has injuries because theirs are also not deemed good enough, therefore their academy does not put ours to shame. I also think this will be our last big transfer window for a few years and that we will gradually phase in academy players. Pep didnt do too bad at Barca bringing a few through. Its an argument that takes several years to prove either way.You saying it's only a matter of time before we see academy players in the first team?
I can't see it if you are mate. Most modern managers with a big kitty seem obsessed with buying the ready made players to slot in. Academy players require time and patience to develop and integrate in to the first team squad. Can't see who the next academy player will be to do that myself.
But that does not highlight exactly why kids should be given an opportunity?
From what you have said he was the third best player at youth level and yet now is an established part of a top 6 squad in England, capped by his country and probably worth in excess of 35 million in the current market. Shows what can happen when presented with an opportunity.
I will defer Neville Kneville here as he clearly knows a lot more about the set up to me and there maybe players ready now but I really hope Sancho, Diaz and Foden get a chance over the next couple of years rather than using the market every time to fix a problem.
I hope you're right about phasing in our home grown, otherwise our academy will just become a mega expensive white elephant.I think foden is one of the best iv seen at that level. Could see Maffeo and Garcia being 1st team squad regulars as well. It is difficult in the cash rich premier league to put youngsters straight in but my point is that mourhino will not play youngsters unless he has injuries because theirs are also not deemed good enough, therefore their academy does not put ours to shame. I also think this will be our last big transfer window for a few years and that we will gradually phase in academy players. Pep didnt do too bad at Barca bringing a few through. Its an argument that takes several years to prove either way.
Not financially - an occasional sale like, say, Kelechi for £20m plus a number of others bringing in the odd million or more each (plus sell-on clauses of course) and the Academy will probably break even over the years, just like the old Platt Lane academy did over the 10 years from 1998 to the takeover - even without SWP's £21m the rest of the sales more or less paid for the running costs. It will take longer to recoup the much larger capital outlay for the new academy but I imagine ADUG factored that in when considering the pros and cons.I hope you're right about phasing in our home grown, otherwise our academy will just become a mega expensive white elephant.
it is important to understand what Rashford is ,he is a poor footballer who the Glaizers need to take over the mantle of icon from Rooney, just a marketing tool his stats do not stand up to Bents.But that does not highlight exactly why kids should be given an opportunity?
From what you have said he was the third best player at youth level and yet now is an established part of a top 6 squad in England, capped by his country and probably worth in excess of 35 million in the current market. Shows what can happen when presented with an opportunity.
I will defer Neville Kneville here as he clearly knows a lot more about the set up to me and there maybe players ready now but I really hope Sancho, Diaz and Foden get a chance over the next couple of years rather than using the market every time to fix a problem.
There's a beautiful fascination witnessing the newspaper industry enter the early stages of its death throes, but the MEN seems to aspire to speeding up that end process.The people running the MEN must be pretty stupid. They are the only local paper I know of to have few if any links to their local clubs - they never get an exclusive, they effectively have to make stories up or feed off second hand scraps and to cap it all they employ United supporting Essex Boys to shovel shit on City - thus alienating a significant chunk of their rapidly declining readership. It's got so bad I even decline a free copy these days - I have no interest in reading the MEN and quite frankly will never read it again... but then again how much longer can it stumble on - it's clearly gone into decline like most papers in recent years but the way it's handled things has been very odd and totally counter productive.