Micah Richards the pundit

Stephen230 said:
I’m neither little nor wokey.

Every single black pundit without exception has being accused on here at some point of only getting the job because they’re black.

That isn’t making something into something it isn’t. It’s repeating a fact.
Click to expand...
To be fair - I too find the term 'ticking a box' quite insulting as someone probably wouldn't use it for a non black person but having said that, you're looking for something to be offended by on every thread.
 
Gazza said:
To be fair - I too find the term 'ticking a box' quite insulting as someone probably wouldn't use it for a non black person but having said that, you're looking for something to be offended by on every thread.
Click to expand...

What else am I offended at out of interest?
 
I think he's good. He provides some light in all the very serious football chat. It doesn't need to be a serious dissection of what happened. It's sport sometimes the better team doesn't win, sometimes a player has a bad day and it's as simple as that. Micah generally is there for some light relief. He knows he isn't smart enough to give a robust technical review of things, but plenty of the pundits aren't. I wouldn't disagree with his opinion on Saliba either. As much as we've got a better squad, and Arsenal should have still won certain games without him, it's a big loss. Our form with and without Dias is very different despite having some very good players.

The Arsenal team in general have folded and lost form, but Saliba has been a key ingredient in their success this season. It's not a coincidence they've dropped so many points without him.
 
Stephen230 said:
I’m neither little nor wokey.

Every single black pundit without exception has being accused on here at some point of only getting the job because they’re black.

That isn’t making something into something it isn’t. It’s repeating a fact.
Click to expand...
patrick vieira , nedum , ian wright ,off the top of my head, all the white pundits who are shit get called out.the white shite pundits are box tickers as well, or do you think paul merson/owen gets the gig because he has excellent footballing knowledge or played for one of the big 4, you like a tussle,and you're trying to find an angle
 
i think he’s okay and at his best at lightweight banter-style stuff. He‘s engaging and does make me laugh but not suited to deep analysis to be honest. Nedum, SWP, Tim Sherwood (loves City) and Robbie Earle are all better pundits from a City perspective but lack Micah’s big personality.
 
supercity88 said:
I think he's good. He provides some light in all the very serious football chat. It doesn't need to be a serious dissection of what happened. It's sport sometimes the better team doesn't win, sometimes a player has a bad day and it's as simple as that. Micah generally is there for some light relief. He knows he isn't smart enough to give a robust technical review of things, but plenty of the pundits aren't. I wouldn't disagree with his opinion on Saliba either. As much as we've got a better squad, and Arsenal should have still won certain games without him, it's a big loss. Our form with and without Dias is very different despite having some very good players.

The Arsenal team in general have folded and lost form, but Saliba has been a key ingredient in their success this season. It's not a coincidence they've dropped so many points without him.
Click to expand...
Was nothing wrong with him saying Saliba has been a big miss.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.