Micah Richards the pundit

I want to defend Micah because on the whole, I think he's a great pundit. He's entertaining, doesn't bow down to the red pundits and he gets far more out of players in the pitch side interviews than most. I also think Nedum is a great pundit for different reasons... very articulate and insightful but he is for sure less entertaining.
 
I want to defend Micah because on the whole, I think he's a great pundit. He's entertaining, doesn't bow down to the red pundits and he gets far more out of players in the pitch side interviews than most. I also think Nedum is a great pundit for different reasons... very articulate and insightful but he is for sure less entertaining.

I miss Nedum's podcast but I guess it was never going to pay the bills.
 
Listened to Micah on Esteemed Kompany's podcast recently and he was saying that he is trying his best to be impartial now that he's on Sky and doesn't want to come across as the City fan that he is, I think he might be trying to hard. I would quite like it if he just completely backed our corner like the rest of the biased pundits.
 
Listened to Micah on Esteemed Kompany's podcast recently and he was saying that he is trying his best to be impartial now that he's on Sky and doesn't want to come across as the City fan that he is, I think he might be trying to hard. I would quite like it if he just completely backed our corner like the rest of the biased pundits.
I wouldn't mind his impartial view if his peers also took the same approach
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.