Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 61,115
No one is offended. Saying someone isn’t very good doesn’t mean that they are offensive.Get a f*cking grip you lot.... Stop getting offended by everything.
No one is offended. Saying someone isn’t very good doesn’t mean that they are offensive.Get a f*cking grip you lot.... Stop getting offended by everything.
This thread is a constant reminder of gary nevilles face, complete f*nny wobbles!No one is offended. Saying someone isn’t very good doesn’t mean that they are offensive.
No, an Arsenal fan
When pundits take the shilling from the BBC, Sky or whatever, they lose the right to represent their old clubs. Micah's a very objective pundit - some aren't so objective and ramble on about the old days. What's he supposed to do, behave like an undertaker because of the second yellow? It's a bit like players that leave and score against us. Franny scored that monster of a goal against us for Derby and quite rightly in my opinion, celebrated like crazy (none of that refusing to celebrate rubbish). Why should our ex players behave like some of our fans want them to - whether scoring against us or doing punditry. Micah didn't mock our loss and I have no problem with his chirpy analysis of the game.Richard's being a right prick on MOTD
Almost mocking our loss yesterday no mention of the second yellow.
And to top it he hopes the rags will be back soon WTF.
HE needs a kick up the arse and shown that banner it seems he has forgot
Every time I hear Nedum, I hear an absolutely stellar broadcasting talent who comments objectively even though he is a City fan.Something that is lost on a lot here. He’s an Arsenal fan who played for us and gets odd jobs for the club but he clearly doesn’t care like a Kompany or a Zabaleta.
A friend of a friend went to college with him and knew Nedum and surprisingly said they both dislike the club now which I suppose because of being upgraded something which Nedum pretty much admitted in his book
Micah Richards was not shit. He was a good player.He got under my skin even when he played for us. As he was shit. But he’s even a shitter pundit. Basically there for the Bantz. He must realise nobody respects his opinion. Sat there next to former players who were twice the player he was and banging on about “when he burst on the scene” they all burst out laughing at him every time! Absolute whopper who wants to see united back! Ffs
You've demeaned yourself by your second-ever comment, well done to you.Richards is a happy chappy, I can see why he may appeal to the younger cohort. But honestly, to most mature folk he comes over like a village idiot, and without an original thought on the tactics or observation. He's simply there to tick a diversity box for all manner of broadcasters.
Nedum Onaha would be a much better pundit, some intelligence and insight.Richards is a happy chappy, I can see why he may appeal to the younger cohort. But honestly, to most mature folk he comes over like a village idiot, and without an original thought on the tactics or observation. He's simply there to tick a diversity box for all manner of broadcasters.