Micah Richards the pundit

[Rory Bluelow]

Embarrassing (again) for him yesterday and possibly even, a new low, which is saying something. The guy has nothing to contribute re tactics of a match, he sees nothing of importance during a game and all he spouts is cliched drivel that anybody could muster. Sooking up to Arse after their anti-football performance yesterday, when they behaved like a 3rd division team hanging on for a draw in the 3rd round of a Cup match was pathetic.
It's depressing that he is the only "City" pundit on our screens at the moment on Sky when there are people who have City to heart who could do a far better job...Joe Hart and Nedum for example. and he's on the BBC as well, it's unbelievable.
Very disappointed in him of late.

Joe Hart was on Optus yesterday and great - tbf Ian Wright was very balanced too. SWP and Tim Sherwood are also decent pundits. Micah is really poor.

 

[Fat Chance]

Narct out of his bollox...he's in his own film.

if you needed any clues ...it's why he's laughing...manipulated his way into a meal ticket.

 

[heslops barnet]

Like we've all stated before. Micahs adherring to his pay masters now.

Always been about the benjamins that lad. No morals.

Comes across as a bit of a knob…….

 

[inbetween]

Unfortunately Micah isn't a pundit and sometimes he's more on there for the entertainment value.

I watch European games 'ahem' on Paramount and it's even worse on there. It can be good entertainment but they barely discuss football. It's more about laughing, making noise and jokes, you can see that their main audience are clueless Americans.

I think Joe Hart is going to do well once he has bedded in.

 

[Johnny Mars Bar]

I actually find Micah to be a very strange guy, there is Somet off about him, does he have a family and kids??

Very weird post.

 

[freshie]

Yeh he's a fucking prick

 

[Xhavenjoe]

Unfortunately Micah isn't a pundit and sometimes he's more on there for the entertainment value.

Unfortunately Micah is a pundit

 

[Lee the Blue]

Richards is a pundit for the modern age - all about the "bants," social media likes and trying to say something funny all the time. When it gets to intricacies of the game rather than looking for a hot take, hes way out of his depth. Dont always agree with Keane but hes brutally honest and will give you a far greater insight than Richards does.

That Paramount/CBS panel is clearly pinned at social media clips and the attention of teenagers who never actually go to matches. Abdo is a decent presenter and Henry tries his best but Richards and that squeeky voiced scouse nerk are just figures of fun.

 

[Johnny Mars Bar]

Richards is a pundit for the modern age - all about the "bants," social media likes and trying to say something funny all the time. When it gets to intricacies of the game rather than looking for a hot take, hes way out of his depth. Dont always agree with Keane but hes brutally honest and will give you a far greater insight than Richards does.

That Paramount/CBS panel is clearly pinned at social media clips and the attention of teenagers who never actually go to matches. Abdo is a decent presenter and Henry tries his best but Richards and that squeeky voiced scouse nerk are just figures of fun.

All the "banter" shit is probably why the likes of Nedum Onouha decided they couldn't be arsed with it.

 

[St Helens Blue (Exiled)]

Is he not an Arsenal fan?