dannybcity
Well-Known Member
Darker shade of Blue said:
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Michael Jackson R.I.P [merged]
- Thread starter HelloCity
- Start date
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
TheMightyQuinn
Well-Known Member
Bigga said:TheMightyQuinn said:Bigga said:TheMightyQuinn said:Do you want me to jump in with both feet? I'd be slaughtered.
Because you know that even by your 'liberal thoughts' that you can't really distinguish a difference, can you?
No, it isn't that it's more the fact that Priscilla Presley and Mandy Smith (see I'm adding to your argument here) appeal more to me than Macauley Culkin.
Are you talking about them in a pre-legal way, TMQ??
No, I'm speculating that the man on the street could perhaps relate to the Lolita effect that surrounded Priscilla and Mandy yet saw Culkin and the other alleged victims as just young lads.
ElanJo
Well-Known Member
Darker shade of Blue said:Do any of you actually understand the words NOT GUILTY ?
Some of you should be ashamed of your comments .
Guilty = Guilty
Not Guilty = Guilty
Didn't you hear? Just being accused of something = Guilty
Bigga
Well-Known Member
Darker shade of Blue said:Do any of you actually understand the words NOT GUILTY ?
Some of you should be ashamed of your comments .
Cos a lot them believe there's no smoke without fire!!
Hamann Pineapple
Well-Known Member
Darker shade of Blue said:Do any of you actually understand the words NOT GUILTY ?
Some of you should be ashamed of your comments .
OJ ?
ElanJo said:I don't think he deliberately put his child in danger either "oh hey, I think I'll put my child in danger". Give me a break. You've probably unknowingly put your kid/s in more danger.
The clue is in the word. Jackson dangled his kid from a window, do you think that is the behaviour of a rational sane person ?
He slept in the same bed as pre pubescent boys, Do you think that is acceptable ?
You're defending the indefensible, he was a grade A fucking fruitcake. Anyone who says he was a sensible rational human being is either deluded or an absolute fucking idiot.
dannybcity
Well-Known Member
stony said:ElanJo said:I don't think he deliberately put his child in danger either "oh hey, I think I'll put my child in danger". Give me a break. You've probably unknowingly put your kid/s in more danger.
The clue is in the word. Jackson dangled his kid from a window, do you think that is the behaviour of a rational sane person ?
He slept in the same bed as pre pubescent boys, Do you think that is acceptable ?
You're defending the indefensible, he was a grade A fucking fruitcake. Anyone who says he was a sensible rational human being is either deluded or an absolute fucking idiot.
Yeah but he could moon walk!!!!
Bigga
Well-Known Member
TheMightyQuinn said:No, I'm speculating that the man on the street could perhaps relate to the Lolita effect that surrounded Priscilla and Mandy yet saw Culkin and the other alleged victims as just young lads.
So... Are you saying because the 'Lolita Effect' is about young girls/ women, it's more... acceptable...?
Darker shade of Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Feb 2009
- Messages
- 2,041
Bigga said:Darker shade of Blue said:Do any of you actually understand the words NOT GUILTY ?
Some of you should be ashamed of your comments .
Cos a lot them believe there's no smoke without fire!!
As long as they remember that their comments are representing your fans and forum for all the public eye to see .
ultimateharold
Well-Known Member
Confirmed