Michael le Vell (Kevin Webster)

[TheMightyQuinn]

Webcam episodes are better than the series.

He tore me a new one during the new year episode and when he goes #topsoff its hilarious...

Yeah I've been watching the webcams he's done on youtube for past few months, when the top comes off you know it's going to be special although it'll take a lot to top Careless Whisper from the other night, I nearly pissed myself.

 

[Barcon]

How do the courts prove someone to be guilty of something that happened so long ago? Surely all DNA evidence is gone etc. Anybody know?

Maybe he confided in somebody and they have turned him in.

 

[baggy]

Haha, yes. Careless Whisper was a recent highlight.

His previous webcam singing Lisa Stansfield was also brilliant...

 

[TheMightyQuinn]

Kevin, Kevin, Kevin Webster!

 

[PinkFinal]

If he's innocent someone must really really hate him to accuse him of things he ain't done. Things this bad.

As for the review of the case, seems suspicious, in fact I don't remember it happening before.

 

[Patientman63]

If he's innocent someone must really really hate him to accuse him of things he ain't done. Things this bad.

As for the review of the case, seems suspicious, in fact I don't remember it happening before.

Maybe the Jimmy Savile thing has persuaded the person in question to push this on. How many people have said "300 or so women, and nobody said anything?" Well perhaps she decided to say something?

Or perhaps she decided to now stand up in court, perhaps originally didn't want to, which makes the CPS case a lot weaker?

Either way, (and in no way defending him) you can understand why some argue for anonymity for the accused until conviction. Whichever way this goes, shit sticks.

 

[Franny Lee's Barrel Chest]

If he's innocent someone must really really hate him to accuse him of things he ain't done. Things this bad.

As for the review of the case, seems suspicious, in fact I don't remember it happening before.

Maybe the Jimmy Savile thing has persuaded the person in question to push this on. How many people have said "300 or so women, and nobody said anything?" Well perhaps she decided to say something?

Or perhaps she decided to now stand up in court, perhaps originally didn't want to, which makes the CPS case a lot weaker?

Either way, (and in no way defending him) you can understand why some argue for anonymity for the accused until conviction. Whichever way this goes, shit sticks.

Might be the case that it was always just one persons word against the other and that wasn't good enough for the CPS to think they have a good chance of a conviction. The CPS might now have had a change of heart and be thinking that there are so many charges to consider that it's in the public interest to let the court decide his guilt or innocence. But I could be wrong. If the same evidence was reviewed and there's no more evidence than before, I can't think what else would have changed their mind. I suppose other recent cases have also contributed to this decision and charging standards have been changed in favour of letting the court decide in these cases.

 

[BlueHammer85]

Even if he was innocent he'll always be known as a peado by people. the law and media needs looking at for incidents like this.

 

[Johnsonontheleft]

Kevin Webster was at Anfield recently:

 

[mcmanus]

Even if he was innocent he'll always be known as a peado by people. the law and media needs looking at for incidents like this.

I will always know the kunt as a red twat first though. Nonce second.