Michael le Vell (Kevin Webster)

How do the courts prove someone to be guilty of something that happened so long ago? Surely all DNA evidence is gone etc. Anybody know?
 
CTID1988 said:
How do the courts prove someone to be guilty of something that happened so long ago? Surely all DNA evidence is gone etc. Anybody know?

You worried about something mate?
 
allan harper said:
CTID1988 said:
How do the courts prove someone to be guilty of something that happened so long ago? Surely all DNA evidence is gone etc. Anybody know?

You worried about something mate?

Er, no, not at all. Why? Whos said something? Go on, who? You cant prove anything. I wasnt there. She fell, i didnt push her, she fell
 
CTID1988 said:
allan harper said:
CTID1988 said:
How do the courts prove someone to be guilty of something that happened so long ago? Surely all DNA evidence is gone etc. Anybody know?

You worried about something mate?

Er, no, not at all. Why? Whos said something? Go on, who? You cant prove anything. I wasnt there. She fell, i didnt push her, she fell

That reminds me. When do I get that spade back? I let you borrow that and that chloroform about this time last year? Bit ungrateful not to return them.
 
CTID1988 said:
allan harper said:
CTID1988 said:
How do the courts prove someone to be guilty of something that happened so long ago? Surely all DNA evidence is gone etc. Anybody know?

You worried about something mate?

Er, no, not at all. Why? Whos said something? Go on, who? You cant prove anything. I wasnt there. She fell, i didnt push her, she fell

Ha! You're best off getting rid of the steroids mate, it won't look good in court.
 
CTID1988 said:
allan harper said:
CTID1988 said:
How do the courts prove someone to be guilty of something that happened so long ago? Surely all DNA evidence is gone etc. Anybody know?

You worried about something mate?

Er, no, not at all. Why? Whos said something? Go on, who? You cant prove anything. I wasnt there. She fell, i didnt push her, she fell

very convincing, you should get an oscar.
 
CTID1988 said:
How do the courts prove someone to be guilty of something that happened so long ago? Surely all DNA evidence is gone etc. Anybody know?
When there are multiple unconnected victims, they often rely on similarities in their stories to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. It's obviously much more difficult to prove anything with only one victim (as in this case), but there are numerous examples of it having happened before so it can be done. In short, I don't know!
 
Webcam episodes are better than the series.

He tore me a new one during the new year episode and when he goes #topsoff its hilarious...
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.