Michael le Vell (Kevin Webster)

kippaxkid74 said:
Pigeonho said:
Can he go for her now then for making up such shite?

typical male response.


when it is one person word against another, jurys often go for not guilty because they are scared of sending down someone if they are only 80% sure he did it - they let the 20% rule their head. It's just how it goes. He got his not guilty verdict, leave it at that, you think he will want this person prosecuted when it's _______________ (can't say, you get done for it)? No. And thankfully the legal system doesn't work like that unless it is totally proven it's untrue.

Typical male response?! Get to fuck.
The guys life is in tatters because of some made up bollocks.
And seeing as the jury was away for about 20 minutes im guessing they were pretty certain
 
moomba said:
denislawsbackheel said:
moomba said:
Not guilty verdict doesnt mean she lied.

And if reporting a rape could lead to recriminations no-one will do it.
Not true. This case is complicated by the age of the girl. A woman who wrongly accuses a man of rape could indeed be pursued through the courts.

Could be if there is evidence she lied. Which there is none.
There was no evidence against the accused either but it still went through the courts
 
CTID1988 said:
kippaxkid74 said:
Pigeonho said:
Can he go for her now then for making up such shite?

typical male response.


when it is one person word against another, jurys often go for not guilty because they are scared of sending down someone if they are only 80% sure he did it - they let the 20% rule their head. It's just how it goes. He got his not guilty verdict, leave it at that, you think he will want this person prosecuted when it's _______________ (can't say, you get done for it)? No. And thankfully the legal system doesn't work like that unless it is totally proven it's untrue.

Typical male response?! Get to fuck.
The guys life is in tatters because of some made up bollocks.

How do you know it is made up?
 
kippaxkid74 said:
Pigeonho said:
Can he go for her now then for making up such shite?

typical male response.


when it is one person word against another, jurys often go for not guilty because they are scared of sending down someone if they are only 80% sure he did it - they let the 20% rule their head. It's just how it goes. He got his not guilty verdict, leave it at that, you think he will want this person prosecuted when it's _______________ (can't say, you get done for it)? No. And thankfully the legal system doesn't work like that unless it is totally proven it's untrue.

Thank god you can't get sent down for 80%. That's nowhere near beyond reasonable doubt.
 
CTID1988 said:
kippaxkid74 said:
Pigeonho said:
Can he go for her now then for making up such shite?

typical male response.


when it is one person word against another, jurys often go for not guilty because they are scared of sending down someone if they are only 80% sure he did it - they let the 20% rule their head. It's just how it goes. He got his not guilty verdict, leave it at that, you think he will want this person prosecuted when it's _______________ (can't say, you get done for it)? No. And thankfully the legal system doesn't work like that unless it is totally proven it's untrue.

Typical male response?! Get to fuck.
The guys life is in tatters because of some made up bollocks.


This

Even now he's been found not guilty people will still look at him and think he could of done it! About time these cases was done in private and then name and shame if found guilty. We can't prove she lied just like she couldn't prove he raped her.
 
Guilty even if proved not guilty on Bluemoon by the sounds of it. She should be investigated and have charges brought against her like all people that falsely claim rape.
 
True_Blue69 said:
Guilty even if proved not guilty on Bluemoon by the sounds of it. She should be investigated and have charges brought against her like all people that falsely claim rape.


I agree but he can't prove she lied just like she couldn't prove he raped her. He is better off getting on with his life but unfortunately people will always look at him funny now or make sly comments
 
Just saw him coming out of the court then, looked like all his christmases had come at once! High fiving people, saluting people across the street.
 
sergiokun said:
True_Blue69 said:
Guilty even if proved not guilty on Bluemoon by the sounds of it. She should be investigated and have charges brought against her like all people that falsely claim rape.


I agree but he can't prove she lied just like she couldn't prove he raped her. He is better off getting on with his life but unfortunately people will always look at him funny now or make sly comments

Maybe people accused should be kept anonymous until they're found guilty.

Either way it has pretty much ruined his life, at the very least it will never be the same again.
 
True_Blue69 said:
Guilty even if proved not guilty on Bluemoon by the sounds of it. She should be investigated and have charges brought against her like all people that falsely claim rape.
It's no surprise on this forum. He is innocent and he should now go for her if that is indeed possible.
Hope the guy gets to get on with his life now.
 
sergiokun said:
CTID1988 said:
kippaxkid74 said:
typical male response.


when it is one person word against another, jurys often go for not guilty because they are scared of sending down someone if they are only 80% sure he did it - they let the 20% rule their head. It's just how it goes. He got his not guilty verdict, leave it at that, you think he will want this person prosecuted when it's _______________ (can't say, you get done for it)? No. And thankfully the legal system doesn't work like that unless it is totally proven it's untrue.

Typical male response?! Get to fuck.
The guys life is in tatters because of some made up bollocks.


This

Even now he's been found not guilty people will still look at him and think he could of done it! About time these cases was done in private and then name and shame if found guilty. We can't prove she lied just like she couldn't prove he raped her.

Yup I know of somebody who's life was ruined because he was wrongly accused of domestic abuse. He was wrongly imprisoned and was actually released after a few months and the girl was locked up for perverting the court of justice.

This horrible ordeal had huge psychological effects on the lad and has struggled to get back in to work.
 
I don't think her going back with further allegations and mentioning 'flashbacks' helped her case. If I was on the jury then that would sound odd to me.
 
not guilty, but did he do it or does she lie, the truth will never be known but one things for sure the cps should have never recomended prosecution in a case that was swinging to a not guilty verdict which is why they turned it away over a year ago
 
True_Blue69 said:
Guilty even if proved not guilty on Bluemoon by the sounds of it. She should be investigated and have charges brought against her like all people that falsely claim rape.

are you saying that in all rape cases where a "Not Guilty" verdict is found that the woman should be prosecuted for false accusation..................................... Bluemoon at its finest.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top