Michelle Mone

As she sold on defective PPE products, fraud?
But was the PPE defective or was it just not up to the job?
I would imagine there would be tender documents specifying the degree of protection required by the PPE being bid for.
If the PPE supplied met those requirements then it's not defective even though it's not good enough for the job. In this case whoever drew up the specifications should be questioned.
If Mone's company supplied PPE that didn't meet the required specification then all directors at that company should be behind bars.
It's also possible the government simply requested "PPE" without specifying the degree of protection required. If that's the case they'll just blame panic and the unprecedented situation.
Finally there's the £60 million. Would this amount be a typical profit margin for the contract entered into?
 
But was the PPE defective or was it just not up to the job?
I would imagine there would be tender documents specifying the degree of protection required by the PPE being bid for.
If the PPE supplied met those requirements then it's not defective even though it's not good enough for the job. In this case whoever drew up the specifications should be questioned.
If Mone's company supplied PPE that didn't meet the required specification then all directors at that company should be behind bars.
It's also possible the government simply requested "PPE" without specifying the degree of protection required. If that's the case they'll just blame panic and the unprecedented situation.
Finally there's the £60 million. Would this amount be a typical profit margin for the contract entered into?

If that was the case why wouldn't this couple go with that from the start rather than deny involvement and beneficial interest in the company?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.