Middle East Conflict

How convenient that the time Israel most needs evidence to prove “it wasn’t them”, as the world began to wake up and smell the coffee and condemn their genocidal atrocities, they’re able to capture crystal clear audio confessions and neatly worded documents that ties it all together like the end of an episode of Scooby Doo.

Investigation done and dusted, with the conclusion that they aren’t the bad guys when the dust hasn’t even settled on the hundreds of dead bodies.

And those pesky IJ/Hamas terrorists would’ve gotten away with it too, if it wasn’t for those meddling Israelis. :rolleyes:

Biden with his unwavering support for the terrorist state is also unsurprising.
Hasbara machine into overdrive .... talk about a zone flooded with shit, not helped by those permanently online OSINT geeks. That audio transcript is fucking laughable.

But fair play it works. Take this thread as a barometer. 24 hours ago people were getting squeamish over the thought of a hospital taking a direct hit.

Taking the current temperature I'd say we are good for a few more days of collective punishment and forced displacement. Not to mention the continued carpet/precision bombing.
 
Do you not understand that after watching Israel level whole neighbourhoods with dozens of rockets of similar power it seems like too much of a coincidence that the only rocket that would lead to a war crimes tribunal just happens not to be someone else's rocket?

Have theire been any similar explosion caused by enemy rockets landing on Israeli territory?
I’m as critical as anyone on here of the Israeli state/government but I don’t think one atrocity by one side prevents any other atrocities by the other of being war crimes also.

They’re both at it. I’m sure there is plenty to be investigated on both sides if there is to be justice for every innocent person being killed, whether they are Israeli or Palestinian.
 
Hasbara machine into overdrive .... talk about a zone flooded with shit, not helped by those permanently online OSINT geeks. That audio transcript is fucking laughable.

But fair play it works. Take this thread as a barometer. 24 hours ago people were getting squeamish over the thought of a hospital taking a direct hit.

Taking the current temperature I'd say we are good for a few more days of collective punishment and forced displacement. Not to mention the continued carpet/precision bombing.
All is forgotten about the Israeli Ambassador to Britain highlighting schools and hospitals as enemy buildings.

If Israelis haven’t bombed the hospital they clearly shouldn’t be blamed for it, but now the onslaught against Gaza civilians is likely to continue. Yes Hamas or Islamic Jihad have committed a war crime if they bombed the hospital and should be held accountable, that is if they aren’t killed sooner.

Biden’s visit turned into an embarrassment. Johnson or Trump might have done better.
 
Less sketchy, but this is someone countering it. Worth saying they’re arguing plausibility rather than anything concrete, no one will know for sure I don’t think unless independent experts are allowed in to investigate.


His pictures still show an impact point in a car park rather than on the hospital, so there seems to be no one on either side saying the hospital itself was actually hit.
 
All is forgotten about the Israeli Ambassador to Britain highlighting schools and hospitals as enemy buildings.

If Israelis haven’t bombed the hospital they clearly shouldn’t be blamed for it, but now the onslaught against Gaza civilians is likely to continue. Yes Hamas or Islamic Jihad have committed a war crime if they bombed the hospital and should be held accountable, that is if they aren’t killed sooner.

Biden’s visit turned into an embarrassment. Johnson or Trump might have done better.
You had me up until your last sentence.
 
No, because the guy himself who posted the tweet said so. Why do you believe him in one instance (the OG tweet) but disbelieve him in the next (His reason for deleting it)? Your logic is all over the place.

The guy himself said he deleted the OG tweet because it was posted under a false assumption.
Ok lets go back to basics and assume you are right and he posted that tweet after misinformation, a falso assumption, a mistake or whatever you want to call it. But we assume it wasnt based on any IDF knowledge and we forget his sole job in the IDF .

What do you think the odds are that he could post such a specific tweet about a hospital attack right after one gets hit.

They must be enormous odds?

If I did twitter I might well ask him for Saturdays lottery numbers.

Anyway good debate , I've got some work to do.

So until the next time.
 
Ok lets go back to basics and assume you are right and he posted that tweet after misinformation, a falso assumption, a mistake or whatever you want to call it. But we assume it wasnt based on any IDF knowledge and we forget his sole job in the IDF .

What do you think the odds are that he could post such a specific tweet about a hospital attack right after one gets hit.

They must be enormous odds?

If I did twitter I might well ask him for Saturdays lottery numbers.

Anyway good debate , I've got some work to do.

So until the next time.
Given the amount of tweets, messages that have been posted in recent days? Quite high. This is just the most high profile one that has been circulated the most.
 
The United States has blocked a United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolution that would have established humanitarian pauses in the ongoing Israeli war on the blockaded Palestinian Gaza Strip.

The US on Wednesday vetoed the resolution that had been drafted by Brazil and had sought to broker aid access to Gaza amid the incessant Israeli airstrikes and shelling against people in the tiny strip of land.

Representatives of 12 countries in the 15-member UNSC voted in favor of the resolution while Britain and Russia abstained. A UNSC resolution needs the approval of all five veto-wielding members of the body, including the US, to pass. Besides, for the resolution to pass, no permanent member should cast a veto.

US Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield justified her country’s veto, saying “this resolution did not mention Israel’s right of self-defense.”

sauce is Iranian.

Why the fuck would we abstain ffs.
 
Ok lets go back to basics and assume you are right and he posted that tweet after misinformation, a falso assumption, a mistake or whatever you want to call it. But we assume it wasnt based on any IDF knowledge and we forget his sole job in the IDF .

What do you think the odds are that he could post such a specific tweet about a hospital attack right after one gets hit.

They must be enormous odds?

If I did twitter I might well ask him for Saturdays lottery numbers.

Anyway good debate , I've got some work to do.

So until the next time.
Second time you’ve said that and I agree.
As the political forum goes I have to say, given the level of emotive issues arising from current events and the forcefulness of some opposing views, the debate by and large has been analytical and cordial even with its diverse conclusions.

I’ve learned quite a bit, which is always good and I’ve researched areas I’ve wondered about before but either lazily or through pure procrastination haven’t educated myself on.

And there seems to be quite a few on here who just genuinely want justice and are looking in or looking on with an open mind.

The debate has been cordial.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top