The Future’s Blue!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 10,877
- Team supported
- City
What, cunts can’t spell?It’s just easier to spell
What, cunts can’t spell?It’s just easier to spell
There are currently 10 million in Israel, the West Bank & Gaza. There's over 2m in the Gaza Strip alone.The population of Ottoman Palestine is difficult to estimate because:
1) There was no administrative district of Palestine. Ottoman census figures were for various districts, e.g. the Jerusalem, Acco and Nablus districts. The Acre district included areas in Lebanon, outside the borders of historic Palestine;
2) Both Arabs and Jews avoided the Turkish census for three reasons: a) to avoid taxes, b) to avoid military conscription, and c) to avoid questions of illegal residence;
3) The census figures didn’t include Bedouins (likely numbering over 100,000) and foreign subjects (i.e. individuals with foreign citizenship, without Ottoman residency status) of which there were about 10,000 Jews.
Nevertheless, the Ottoman census of 1878 indicated the following demographics for the Jerusalem, Nablus, and Acre districts:
Census Group Population Percentage Muslim 403,795 85.5 Christian 43,659 9.2 Jewish 15,001 3.2 Jewish (Foreign-born) Est. 10,000 2.1 Total: 472,455 100.0
Yeah very “sparse”.
with my sausage fingers it is quicker to use on a long post than netanyahuPeople calling that **** ‘Bibi’ is akin to others calling our own **** ‘Boris’. Fucking Bibi ffs.
I’ll make an exception with you xwith my sausage fingers it is quicker to use on a long post than netanyahu
Wonderful whataboutary.
Nazis yes. Stalin killed a lot of Russians but the main pogroms that took place were well before his time. The Tsarist regime were responsible for 2 19th century pogroms whilst during Bolshevik and subsequent civil war there was a 3rd major progrom carried out by retreating White Army brigades. One part of the Red Army was involved, they were Ukrainians, and we're court-martialled for their crimes.
My source was a Jewish history page.
Any court case could be interesting, proving that she is
"A person who uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is threatening, abusive or insulting, is guilty of an offence if—
(a) he intends thereby to stir up racial hatred, or
(b) having regard to all the circumstances racial hatred is likely to be stirred up thereby."
"My client's defence is that Israel is led by a man who advocates ethnic cleansing, and that's what is stirring up racial hatred, not her displaying material pointing that out."
I suppose that depends on whether you think land gained by conquest becomes part of the victor's country or whether it remains a separate territory as part of an "empire". I doubt the Ottomans called Palestine what, for the sake of the argument I shall call, Turkey, or the British referred to it as Britain.It’s just fact.
But it was never "a land without people for a people without land". The Highlands were sparsely populated, especially after the Clearances. So was "the West" as in how the West was won. It's a sparse argument in favour of colonisation.There are currently 10 million in Israel, the West Bank & Gaza. There's over 2m in the Gaza Strip alone.
So I'd say, compared to that, 5% is sparse. And that 472k probably included about 150k who came in from Egypt and Syria around the mid-19th century.