gio's side step
Well-Known Member
Ok, before someone informs me that there is already a thread about Ireland potentially going to Villa, I want to consider raising a direct discussion about the differences between them as players, and subsequently, what type of player we need more.
For me, Millner offers the following
- Good engine, lots of energy, can drive forward from midfield, decent delivery if played out wide, use both feet, appears mentally tough and self driven, has a goal in him, versatile
Ireland offers the following
- Composure on the ball, good football brain, can pick out a first time pass which many others wouldnt see, use both feet, links well with the better technical players, has a goal in him, mentally can suffer at times
Additionally, both seem to be the type of player who don't naturally fit into any real system. It's hard to define what their best position is. For example, Villa bought Millner as a versatile player, but who mainly played out wide, yet he wasnt the Adam Johnson 'go at players' type of wide player, more of an up and down, good engine, and more focus on crossing from deep. It was only last season where Villa moved him more centrally. Having watched him, I would say he offers nothing exceptional in terms of playing as a central midfield player, he might offer energy (which Barry lacks for example), but he's not an Arteta, Fabregas so it is difficult to see how he could naturally fit into our team. If he had been a Xavi, or Xabi Alonso, Arteta, then I could see how he would solve one of our big problems, which an inability to keep posession at times.
Ireland however, offers composure, technique, but again, he doesnt naturally fit into what we appear to believe is Mancini's preferred style of playing. My worry here is, that Ireland will play more centrally in a 4-4-2 at Villa, and might settle better with one deeper player next to him, than Millner will in our team. Some of you might offer an alternative way of seeing this, and offer a different description of their qualities and weaknesses etc (please do), but I am coming to the conclusion, that really, we need NEITHER. Not as starting players anyway. Just don't see how either naturally fit into the team, other than Millner to give us a bit of energy, or Ireland to play a one touch pass (when he gets on the ball, which is about once every 30 minutes)
As a result, I am a bit concerned about how much we are paying for Millner and how much we are letting Ireland go for.
For me, Millner offers the following
- Good engine, lots of energy, can drive forward from midfield, decent delivery if played out wide, use both feet, appears mentally tough and self driven, has a goal in him, versatile
Ireland offers the following
- Composure on the ball, good football brain, can pick out a first time pass which many others wouldnt see, use both feet, links well with the better technical players, has a goal in him, mentally can suffer at times
Additionally, both seem to be the type of player who don't naturally fit into any real system. It's hard to define what their best position is. For example, Villa bought Millner as a versatile player, but who mainly played out wide, yet he wasnt the Adam Johnson 'go at players' type of wide player, more of an up and down, good engine, and more focus on crossing from deep. It was only last season where Villa moved him more centrally. Having watched him, I would say he offers nothing exceptional in terms of playing as a central midfield player, he might offer energy (which Barry lacks for example), but he's not an Arteta, Fabregas so it is difficult to see how he could naturally fit into our team. If he had been a Xavi, or Xabi Alonso, Arteta, then I could see how he would solve one of our big problems, which an inability to keep posession at times.
Ireland however, offers composure, technique, but again, he doesnt naturally fit into what we appear to believe is Mancini's preferred style of playing. My worry here is, that Ireland will play more centrally in a 4-4-2 at Villa, and might settle better with one deeper player next to him, than Millner will in our team. Some of you might offer an alternative way of seeing this, and offer a different description of their qualities and weaknesses etc (please do), but I am coming to the conclusion, that really, we need NEITHER. Not as starting players anyway. Just don't see how either naturally fit into the team, other than Millner to give us a bit of energy, or Ireland to play a one touch pass (when he gets on the ball, which is about once every 30 minutes)
As a result, I am a bit concerned about how much we are paying for Millner and how much we are letting Ireland go for.