Missing Girl found, bloke arrested.

[stony]

What would have happened if they had gone to France separately on different days. He goes first then she travels on her own the day after and they meet up.
Seeing as the age of consent in France is 15 and he has so far only been arrested for child abduction, could they have charged him with that if she had gone on her own ?

 

[SWP's back]

I am not missing any point, I am just crediting a young adult with a brain capable of making some decisions.

I have never said that taking her out of the country was anything other than wrong but I think the whole thing has been completely blown out of proportion. I agree with the French police's attitude to it, which was "Fuck it, we'll arrest him if he turns up but we won't look for him".

Bang on the money. Cant believe this story has been blown so far out of proportion.

You do know when 30 year old blokes abduct children and fuck off abroad its just wrong dont you?

This is the bluemoon thought police, you will comply.....

 

[hilts]

Prison sentence for sleeping with a child?

But you don't know if he has done.
That is why we have those court thingys.
So maybe we should let a judge and jury decide after hearing all the evidence.

I know that nf
I'm asking squirty and others if he has slept with her and they both admit it, should he go to prison and does that make him a nonce?

Any sentence if consensual sex was proved would depend on the details of the case which we dont know, if he has any history of preying on young women then prison, if it is a moment of stupid madness by someone who believes himself to be in love and isnt a danger to others then community service would be more applicable in my opinion

 

[bennyblue]

Seems to be a lot of use about Gillick Competent, just to clarify the legal position
A child who is deemed "Gillick competent" is able to prevent their parents viewing their medical records. As such, medical staff will not make a disclosure of medical records of a child who is deemed "Gillick competent"

As such it means nothing at all in this case and nor could this be used in any arguments

 

[SWP's back]

And what if he has had sex with her squirty,what do you think should happen to him?

i think the law of the land should be upheld and justice take it's course

Prison sentence for sleeping with a child?

Why? They were in France where she isn't classed as a child.

 

[bernabias home shirt]

Seems to be a lot of use about Gillick Competent, just to clarify the legal position
A child who is deemed "Gillick competent" is able to prevent their parents viewing their medical records. As such, medical staff will not make a disclosure of medical records of a child who is deemed "Gillick competent"

As such it means nothing at all in this case and nor could this be used in any arguments

I'm waiting for him to answer my question...

 

[SWP's back]

Seems to be a lot of use about Gillick Competent, just to clarify the legal position
A child who is deemed "Gillick competent" is able to prevent their parents viewing their medical records. As such, medical staff will not make a disclosure of medical records of a child who is deemed "Gillick competent"

As such it means nothing at all in this case and nor could this be used in any arguments

I'm waiting for him to answer my question...

Which question?

 

[bernabias home shirt]

I know that nf
I'm asking squirty and others if he has slept with her and they both admit it, should he go to prison and does that make him a nonce?

No, and no. He should lose his career and he will. That should be the price he pays for abusing his position of trust. The legal price he should pay for being a thirty year old having sex with a Gillick competent individual should be the same as anybody else, namely none at all.

So you saying any bloke 20,30 or 40 can have sex with a 15 year old?

This one...

 

[Skashion]

So you saying any bloke 20,30 or 40 can have sex with a 15 year old?

a Gillick competent one, yes. The CPS wouldn't dream of bringing a case for a normal fifteen year old unless the girl herself had made the complaint. The law rightfully assumes that magic sixteen fairies don't just descend and wave a wand and suddenly a sixteen year old has all the reasoning faculties a fifteen year old doesn't have. I am interested to see why people readily accept at fifteen it's not fine but at sixteen you can stomach it. Is it really just that you value words really on a piece of paper passed by Parliament rather than the underlying logic and/or morality?

 

[bernabias home shirt]

So you saying any bloke 20,30 or 40 can have sex with a 15 year old?

a Gillick competent one, yes. The CPS wouldn't dream of bringing a case for a normal fifteen year old unless the girl herself had made the complaint. The law rightfully assumes that magic sixteen fairies don't just descend and wave a wand and suddenly a sixteen year old has all the reasoning faculties a fifteen year old doesn't have. I am interested to see why people readily accept at fifteen it's not fine but at sixteen you can stomach it. Is it really just that you value words really on a piece of paper passed by Parliament rather than the underlying logic and/or morality?

So you wouldnt have a problem doing it then?