sir baconface
Well-Known Member
He has the consolation of not being alone.Again speculation, we don't know what equipment was used and indeed was the guy just an attention seeking idiot?
He has the consolation of not being alone.Again speculation, we don't know what equipment was used and indeed was the guy just an attention seeking idiot?
You are missing the point. I was dimy explaining sonar capabilities, not what type he used or didn't useAgain speculation, we don't know what equipment was used and indeed was the guy just an attention seeking idiot?
He has the consolation of not being alone.
Shameless horrible woman. Her conduct in the area when covering the April Jones case when she was missing and not found was contemptible.
Fairly sure his equipment wouldn’t have a “fell in the river” mode that operates differently to the “jumped in the river” mode. He’s clearly made a mug of himself with his categorical assurances and is trying to make up excuses.The guy who searched the river says if he'd have known at the time she had alcohol issues, he'd have done a completely different type of search. As it was, he only search as if she'd slipped
Riverbanks are not flush, and bodies of water are not empty under the waterline…
She went in the water when it was engorged due to heavy rain, and the water would’ve been filled with debris washed in.
Her body will have simply gotten caught in a void, or tangled in debris, only becoming visible now that the waters have receded.
It’s no secret that bodies pop up every year around bodies of water in late winter/early spring.
In what way,? gen question btwThis thread is the skidmark on Bluemoon’s underpants. Shameful.