Missing woman Nicola Bulley - inquest (P 158)

Not too crazy mate, we simply don't know why she was not found on the earlier searches.

That said, it doesn't seem plausible for obvious reasons

As I typed it I also realised it would have been an extremely risky procedure due to the high volume of interest in that vicinity, although I guess that would have abated recently.
 
He actually said 'had I known she was high risk it would have changed things'...what bit of looking for a dead body did he fail to understand was high risk. Bloke has come across as a self publicising idiot.

It changed it because he was presuming she accidentally fell in. If possibly suicidal she might have jumped, which he said meant there was more chance of her being swept downstream.
 
It changed it because he was presuming she accidentally fell in. If possibly suicidal she might have jumped, which he said meant there was more chance of her being swept downstream.
But either way he had to know she was 'high risk'-otherwise he would'nt have been there.

A low or medium risk person isn't in the water after all that time....

The high risk category doesn't just relate to the motivation of the missing person, but their risk of coming to harm:

for example, an elderly person suffering from dementia and wandering off is high risk, yet have no intention of self harm.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.