Missing woman Nicola Bulley - inquest (P 158)

[remember arthur mann]

River was always the most plausible explanation and the Police knew so

Some were just desperate to jump on and make up conspiracy stories

Yep, far too many Agatha Christie's about.

 

[BlueHammer85]

Yep, far too many Agatha Christie's about.

Now it’s ‘she was murdered and put in the river’

so predictable

 

[mosssideblue]

But either way he had to know she was 'high risk'-otherwise he would'nt have been there.

The high risk category doesn't just relate to the motivation of the missing person, but their risk of coming to harm.

Wasn't he there because Lancs plod hadn't found her and he had better equipment and that the family requested it

 

[paulchapo]

But either way he had to know she was 'high risk'-otherwise he would'nt have been there.

A low or medium risk person isn't in the water after all that time....

The high risk category doesn't just relate to the motivation of the missing person, but their risk of coming to harm:

for example, an elderly person suffering from dementia and wandering off is high risk, yet have no intention of self harm.

If he thought she'd accidentally fallen in as opposed to jumping he said it would have changed his search pattern. Don't ask me how he's the expert.

He was there because he volunteered his services as his equipment was far superior to anything the police had.

 

[paulchapo]

Now it’s ‘she was murdered and put in the river’

so predictable

It's been a bit of an unusual case, people speculate.

 

[bert38]

Wasn't he there because Lancs plod hadn't found her and he had better equipment and that the family requested it

Yes, but the police believed she was in the water-clearly that makes her high risk-along with all the other information that the police would have been aware of-rather than the media or numpties on social media.

My point is he said he wasn't told she was 'high risk'. Just what risk level did he think she was? Its ridiculous to suggest otherwise.

 

[Millwallawayveteran1988]

RIP. Poor soul.

 

[bert38]

If he thought she'd accidentally fallen in as opposed to jumping he said it would have changed his search pattern. Don't ask me how he's the expert.

He was there because he volunteered his services as his equipment was far superior to anything the police had.

But we don't know how she ended up in the water do we? -unless of course there was other evidence to point towards that. The hypothesis was she was in the water..and by that alone she's high risk.

 

[PragueBlue]

My point is he said he wasn't told she was 'high risk'. Just what risk level did he think she was? Its ridiculous to suggest otherwise.

I assume he meant high risk of suicide.

 

[mosssideblue]

Yes, but the police believed she was in the water-clearly that makes her high risk-along with all the other information that the police would have been aware of-rather than the media or numpties on social media.

My point is he said he wasn't told she was 'high risk'. Just what risk level did he think she was? Its ridiculous to suggest otherwise.

Apologies if I'm misunderstanding you, but it sounds like you are saying if she's in the water and high risk, then she is still alive in the water