Missing woman Nicola Bulley - inquest (P 158)

I don’t know if it’s been said but I think many (including the police) were assuming that after the last sighting of Nicola by the dog walker, she made her way over to the bench, where she left the phone and harness before entering the river. I’d say it’s just as likely that she left the phone on the bench, before walking to the area where she was last sighted and entered the river there. Just a minor error in sequencing that would explain where the body was found and why the police were originally searching in the wrong area. Easy to be wise after the event.
Hopefully, in time, Nicola’s family can come to terms with her loss and move on.

In that case wouldn't the dog have followed her to that spot? The dog was found back near the bench where the phone & harness were and (I think) first reports said it kept going from the bench to the water's edge, perhaps showing where she had gone in.

Also, if she'd gone in at the area of her last sighting in the stretch of river surrounding the upper field, that part of the river is a few hundred yards further upstream than the bench. Her body would have had to be passing through the area of river near the bench, as they were searching it. I don't think your wrong that she entered a different part of the river but I believe she went back through the gate, past the bridge and weir and went in the river somewhere around there.
 
Also, if she'd gone in at the area of her last sighting in the stretch of river surrounding the upper field, that part of the river is a few hundred yards further upstream than the bench. Her body would have had to be passing through the area of river near the bench, as they were searching it. I don't think your wrong that she entered a different part of the river but I believe she went back through the gate, past the bridge and weir and went in the river somewhere around there.
I think Peter Faulding’s observation that the body would likely stay in, or return to a similar position, is probably correct. Is the river tidal in the place she was found? In any case, it could have been snagged on the undergrowth there, so maybe didn’t move much at all.
 
Last edited:
I think Peter Faulding’s observation that the body would likely stay in, or return to a similar position, is probably correct. Is the river tidal in the place she was found? In any case, it could have been snagged on the undergrowth there, so maybe didn’t move much at all.

Yes it is tidal there, it becames tidal below the bridge at St Michaels. I think the weir is about 100m from the bridge looking at photo's. They are saying the body didn't move much because it may have been wedged under a half fallen tree which was almost horizontal to the water. You can see the tree in this picture.

0_PA-71051072.jpg
 
Last edited:
It was ITV as well as sky that the family said contacted them direct

I dont know if the family will ever get the reason she was in the river , the coroner and maybe an inquest will take months , hope they are left alone now

Social media, the news channels mentioned and the papers are poison but we knew that already
 
The so called expert Peter Faulding has been made to look like a complete idiot. His team had even searched that stretch of river where Nicola was found. Didn't anybody think to search the reed bed?
His team's negligence have made this horrible saga drag on for her distraught family and friends, when they should have had some closure weeks ago.
RIP Nicola.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.