Missing woman Nicola Bulley - inquest (P 158)

Being realistic, it doesn't look like she ever went in the water.
I would be focussing on the area covered by the security camera which wasn't working.
If someone had been watching Nicolas' movements over a while and knew which camera to disable, there would be no video evidence of where she was taken to.
My theory is that she walked with whoever took her, to the camp site and kept her there somewhere.
She would have known the person, walked willingly with him, (taking her dog and phone to wherever it was) been silenced in some way and the person who took her returned with the phone and dog and left them at the bench a short time later.
 
The SGI leader said they did 3 miles of river yesterday and found nothing. He is baffled as the river is slow moving and people who drown do not tend to move far from the place it happened.

They are doing another stretch today.
 
I would be focussing on the area covered by the security camera which wasn't working.
If someone had been watching Nicolas' movements over a while and knew which camera to disable, there would be no video evidence of where she was taken to.
My theory is that she walked with whoever took her, to the camp site and kept her there somewhere.
She would have known the person, walked willingly with him, (taking her dog and phone to wherever it was) been silenced in some way and the person who took her returned with the phone and dog and left them at the bench a short time later.
She Regularly walked by the river. Young attractive woman may have caught the attention of a stalker who over a period sussed out that camera and planned his move
 
Somebody mentioned Occams Razor a while back (the principle that the simplest explanation is likely to be the correct one). So no matter why she did it, the most obvious explanation is that she has just walked off of her own accord and is in hiding somewhere. I will let others speculate as to why that may be.
 
Somebody mentioned Occams Razor a while back (the principle that the simplest explanation is likely to be the correct one). So no matter why she did it, the most obvious explanation is that she has just walked off of her own accord and is in hiding somewhere. I will let others speculate as to why that may be.

Is that the simplest explanation though ? she would have had to evaded hundreds of CCTV around the local areas, eyewitnesses and not used a bank card etc

I'd say simplest explanation is she fell in river, died and just not been found.
 
Somebody mentioned Occams Razor a while back (the principle that the simplest explanation is likely to be the correct one). So no matter why she did it, the most obvious explanation is that she has just walked off of her own accord and is in hiding somewhere. I will let others speculate as to why that may be.
How is your theory anything other than the speculation you seem to want to distance yourself from?
 
How is your theory anything other than the speculation you seem to want to distance yourself from?
Every theory of what happened to her is speculation until we know for certain, so yes I agree it is speculation but it is one of only three possibilities. I don't though think we should speculate on here, in public, as to why she may have done that. The family have complained about 'hurtful theories' and I personally would not wish to take part in that on a public forum. What I think happened I will keep to myself.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.