Missing woman Nicola Bulley - inquest (P 158)

Every theory of what happened to her is speculation until we know for certain, so yes I agree it is speculation but it is one of only three possibilities. I don't though think we should speculate on here, in public, as to why she may have done that. The family have complained about 'hurtful theories' and I personally would not wish to take part in that on a public forum. What I think happened I will keep to myself.
What three, why not more?
 
I would be focussing on the area covered by the security camera which wasn't working.
If someone had been watching Nicolas' movements over a while and knew which camera to disable, there would be no video evidence of where she was taken to.
My theory is that she walked with whoever took her, to the camp site and kept her there somewhere.
She would have known the person, walked willingly with him, (taking her dog and phone to wherever it was) been silenced in some way and the person who took her returned with the phone and dog and left them at the bench a short time later.
Well they do say that over 70% of murder victims know the perpetrator.
 
It's a really strange case, in that there doesn't seem to be many things that could have happen, but all of them seem very odd. It's most likely that she fell in the river and drowned sadly. It seems odd that she did, but these things do happen unfortunately.

There was a potential route out of the area, unseen by CCTV but in broad daylight you'd be surprised she just left her phone and dog and went with someone under duress. She could have gone with someone she knew, but again, you'd imagine she'd take her phone and dog.

Maybe she was having some mental health problems and wanted to escape, so left her phone and dog and disappeared of her own accord. I find that very strange though. Wouldn't you leave your dog at home in that case? Wouldn't you take the kids to school and then just go? You wouldn't be thinking logically but I doubt you'd join a work call and then decide to do it.
 
Is that the simplest explanation though ? she would have had to evaded hundreds of CCTV around the local areas, eyewitnesses and not used a bank card etc

Could have squirrelled cash away or fraudulently obtained cards under a different name.

Potential motives for dissappearing, life insurance scam like Canoe Man or found a new man or woman.

I'd say simplest explanation is she fell in river, died and just not been found.

This is most likely what happened.
 
Is there concrete evidence that she actually went down that path? Necker anyone can plant a phone on a bench and a dog lead
 
Well all I can think of is;
1. She has fallen in the River
2. She has been taken away against her will
3. She has left voluntarily
I don't think there are any other possibilities are there ?
Chinese balloon carried her away
 
It's a really strange case, in that there doesn't seem to be many things that could have happen, but all of them seem very odd. It's most likely that she fell in the river and drowned sadly. It seems odd that she did, but these things do happen unfortunately.

There was a potential route out of the area, unseen by CCTV but in broad daylight you'd be surprised she just left her phone and dog and went with someone under duress. She could have gone with someone she knew, but again, you'd imagine she'd take her phone and dog.

Maybe she was having some mental health problems and wanted to escape, so left her phone and dog and disappeared of her own accord. I find that very strange though. Wouldn't you leave your dog at home in that case? Wouldn't you take the kids to school and then just go? You wouldn't be thinking logically but I doubt you'd join a work call and then decide to do it.
Your dog would almost certainly follow you if you just wandered off too.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.