supercity36
Well-Known Member
the author of this thread cant really stand up for DS, and i would ask him if he were MH would he give him 60k a week. even if he isnt after this ridiculous wage, he would have signed a contract no?
Agree with 99% of that Robbie. I think you were being very kind when you said his attitude was 'questionable' at times, when that lad is not up for a game (sadly frequent) he makes it known in no uncertain terms, it is rare to see a player so disinterested as young Danny.RobbieBrewer said:The way some people talk about Sturridge as if he's "the next Maradona" baffles me.
Reminds me of the type of mass hysteria reserved for players like Micheda at the rags.
Sturridge is simply a good prospect-no more than that.Exactly as he's been for the last three seasons.
He's young.
He's struggles with injuries.
He's proved nothing that we didn't already know.
His "attitude" and body language on the pitch is often questionable.
He's absolutely nowhere near the finished article.
He could turn into a superb player.He might not.
If he wants to sign-great.If he doesn't-great.
It's no great loss.
There'll surely be others.
Unlike in the past,our immediate future as a football club or whether we stay up is not tied entirely to whether Sturridge has fallen out with Hughes,whether his family is involved,whether he wants 70 grand a week,whether he wants to play for the rags-I don't give a toss.
Does he want to play for City?Or does he want to go elsewhere?
It's up to him.
He's just not important enough to the team to warrant all this aggro.
Blumers Bloomers said:What is absolutely criminal here and it seems to be overlooked is that one of our best home grown talents is moving on, and Manchester City will be receiving no fee whatsoever . Why arent people up in arms about this?