You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
MOTD
- Thread starter inbetween
- Start date
MCC said:9 man chelsea etc etc Chelsea should have been out of sight by half time etc etc..........
GARY......................NO
ALAN......................NO
ALAN......................NO
LAWRO....................NOOOOO
GET FUCKED!
It could have been 5-0 to Chelsea by H/T,Hanson says, and "iwas fully expecting Mancini to get the sack".
Fucking awful MOTD coverage from start to end. All about Chelski being shite. No credit for City at all. And yet had this been the rags .... well, you know.
So yes,
GET FUCKED.
lee-mcfc said:PMSL that goal still cracks me UPP!!
How long did that ball take to trickle over the line. Half an hour, it took.
Bluemoon115
Well-Known Member
I enjoyed it Pam.Pam said:MCC said:9 man chelsea etc etc Chelsea should have been out of sight by half time etc etc..........
GARY......................NO
ALAN......................NO
ALAN......................NO
LAWRO....................NOOOOO
GET FUCKED!
It could have been 5-0 to Chelsea by H/T,Hanson says, and "iwas fully expecting Mancini to get the sack".
Fucking awful MOTD coverage from start to end. All about Chelski being shite. No credit for City at all. And yet had this been the rags .... well, you know.
So yes,
GET FUCKED.
Watching them try to discredit us so much is the biggest compliment they can pay us.
I don't care what they say, I just wanted to watch the goals.
Fuck em, they all bottled management anyway.
without a dream
Well-Known Member
cleavers said:That was on SKY.without a dream said:Bottled showing Bellers interview, shame I was looking forwards to seeing it again!
I'll let them off then.
Ducado
Well-Known Member
It was not like we won the match or deserved to win, no mention of the typical Chelsea tactic of playing dirty when the game is not going their way, all in all very strange, mind you the commentator was willing Chelsea on, how very strange
Nelly's Left Foot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Mar 2009
- Messages
- 6,054
Not far off the right description of the game up and till we scored we were shocking.
Bluemoon115
Well-Known Member
If it had taken any longer it would have been an own goal in the second half.Pam said:lee-mcfc said:PMSL that goal still cracks me UPP!!
How long did that ball take to trickle over the line. Half an hour, it took.
cleavers
Moderator
Pam said:It could have been 5-0 to Chelsea by H/T,Hanson says, and "iwas fully expecting Mancini to get the sack".
Fucking awful MOTD coverage from start to end. All about Chelski being shite. No credit for City at all. And yet had this been the rags .... well, you know.
So yes,
GET FUCKED.
We were pretty poor until Tevez equalised though, even Mancini said we played better on Wednesday night.
It doesn't matter what they say, the scoreline says Chelsea 2-4 Manchester City, good enough for me, first goals there in 10 years, their first home defeat in 15 months, and our first double over them in 53 years.