MikeF
Well-Known Member
i couldn't help but notice that Shearer had difficulty in saying Craig Bellamy's name, now, why is that?!!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
MOTD
- Thread starter inbetween
- Start date
MCFC BOB
Well-Known Member
We get 3 points, and what do they get? ;)Pam said:MCC said:9 man chelsea etc etc Chelsea should have been out of sight by half time etc etc..........
GARY......................NO
ALAN......................NO
ALAN......................NO
LAWRO....................NOOOOO
GET FUCKED!
It could have been 5-0 to Chelsea by H/T,Hanson says, and "iwas fully expecting Mancini to get the sack".
Fucking awful MOTD coverage from start to end. All about Chelski being shite. No credit for City at all. And yet had this been the rags .... well, you know.
So yes,
GET FUCKED.
MCFC BOB
Well-Known Member
We get 3 points, and what do they get? ;)Pam said:MCC said:9 man chelsea etc etc Chelsea should have been out of sight by half time etc etc..........
GARY......................NO
ALAN......................NO
ALAN......................NO
LAWRO....................NOOOOO
GET FUCKED!
It could have been 5-0 to Chelsea by H/T,Hanson says, and "iwas fully expecting Mancini to get the sack".
Fucking awful MOTD coverage from start to end. All about Chelski being shite. No credit for City at all. And yet had this been the rags .... well, you know.
So yes,
GET FUCKED.
haha, seriously though my nanna could have saved itPam said:lee-mcfc said:PMSL that goal still cracks me UPP!!
How long did that ball take to trickle over the line. Half an hour, it took.
mcfcliam
Well-Known Member
MCfcBOB said:We get 3 points, and what do they get? ;)Pam said:It could have been 5-0 to Chelsea by H/T,Hanson says, and "iwas fully expecting Mancini to get the sack".
Fucking awful MOTD coverage from start to end. All about Chelski being shite. No credit for City at all. And yet had this been the rags .... well, you know.
So yes,
GET FUCKED.
John Terry.
Humlannitton
Well-Known Member
On swedish TV (Canal+) City got all the credit, and especially the central midfielders (De Jong, Barry, Zabby). Said City didn't allow Che£$ki to make a good performance, and that Mancinis defensive tactics in the first half were just right.Pam said:Fucking awful MOTD coverage from start to end. All about Chelski being shite. No credit for City at all. And yet had this been the rags .... well, you know.
Blue2112
Well-Known Member
cleavers said:Pam said:It could have been 5-0 to Chelsea by H/T,Hanson says, and "iwas fully expecting Mancini to get the sack".
Fucking awful MOTD coverage from start to end. All about Chelski being shite. No credit for City at all. And yet had this been the rags .... well, you know.
So yes,
GET FUCKED.
We were pretty poor until Tevez equalised though, even Mancini said we played better on Wednesday night.
It doesn't matter what they say, the scoreline says Chelsea 2-4 Manchester City, good enough for me, first goals there in 10 years, their first home defeat in 15 months, and our first double over them in 53 years.
No doubt somebody will correct me if I'm wrong but I think beating them at their place means we now have the longest unbeaten home run in the Premiership.