remember arthur mann
Well-Known Member
The Pink Panther said:Blue Mooner said:When will people realise that you can edit a 90 minute match and edit highlights to present exactly what you want to present.
The analysis of Dimechelis was so selective in nature, to present a narrative about his defending that Hanson wanted to portray. What I found amazing is that his examples were so unbelievably puerile and led to nothing In particular by way of Fulham chances.
I really wouldn't be bothered were it not the weak minded and un independent thinking viewers who just regurgitate this nonsense and hence perpetuate the myth. These are usually people who have not watched the game in its entirety and simply choose to believe what they are told by Hanson and his ilk.
Contrast this narrative with the eulogy about the return of the rags wing play as a result of two mediocre results against two mediocre teams. If anyone can't see this different agenda/treatment of the respective clubs then you are simply denying the blindingly obvious.
One Hansen drew attention to was Demichelis divng in on the half way line, he missed the ball and it led to Fulham's first goal
Hansen does have a point that Demichelis is on his arse too much, but as the majority have said, Hansen should have balanced it with the good aspects of our play, especially as we won by scoring four goals
I think Silva not releasing the ball and having it taken off him, led to the first goal.