Motormouth Hopkins been sacked ?

Just wondering if the Hopkins 'Final solution' tweet extends to the owners of our football club.. Would be interesting to hear what her sycophants and apologists think about that.. After all.. Even the thickest of the thickest understands the term 'Final Solution'
 
1) that was not an "attack".

2) we have no idea what he was saying that caused him to be moved. Whilst his sign wasn't something I disagreed with, let's imagine for a moment as an example (potentially a poor one but maybe you will see where i'm coming from) that he was talking about how great Shipman was on a street in Hyde. Is his sign so sensible then?

3) you're a Rag

4) When's your mate back?

It was an attack of course it was. Just listen to them? Some of these extreme left followers seem to be angry violent and have a voice bigger than their movement suggests. I treat far left and right with equal disdain and we should call them what they are. Thugs.
 
Just wondering if the Hopkins 'Final solution' tweet extends to the owners of our football club.. Would be interesting to hear what her sycophants and apologists think about that.. After all.. Even the thickest of the thickest understands the term 'Final Solution'

Our owner have nothing to do with this though do they? Hopkins over stepped the mark of decency most people would accept that and accept she rightly lost her voice for voicing a distasteful opinion showing what she probably genuinely believes.
 
It was an attack of course it was. Just listen to them? Some of these extreme left followers seem to be angry violent and have a voice bigger than their movement suggests. I treat far left and right with equal disdain and we should call them what they are. Thugs.

Unfortunately for him, his sign supports what they were doing, given that they were freely sharing their ideas. I think more people are extremely politicised than ever and that's what leads to these kind of things, from both sides.
 
Unfortunately for him, his sign supports what they were doing, given that they were freely sharing their ideas. I think more people are extremely politicised than ever and that's what leads to these kind of things, from both sides.

They physically touched him and that does constitute an assault. The problem with todays politics is that people don't want to hear what other people have to say and will use any method to shut them down, I want to hear it so I can make a decision if they are appealing to me or not.
 
Our owner have nothing to do with this though do they? Hopkins over stepped the mark of decency most people would accept that and accept she rightly lost her voice for voicing a distasteful opinion showing what she probably genuinely believes.

Of course our owners have nothing to do with this, nor have over 2 million muslims in the UK and hundreds of millions throughout the world but we all know what she damn well meant
 
I dare say that there a few moderates and a fair few imams that turn a blind eye to this kind of behaviour and that's bang out of order, but the way you're carrying on with yourself you're implying that every Muslim in the country knows a paedo and/or a jihadi which is quite clearly bollocks. Maybe you want me to go banging on the door of the house a few doors down from me and interrogate the Muslim family living there as to whether they know of any of these extremists?

As for the raids, well I'm guessing that the police need some evidence first before they go around blowing doors off people's houses. What makes you think they only ever do this kind of thing whenever an attack actually happens? Plenty of attacks have been foiled that never see the light of day and I'm sure that in foiling them there have been hundreds of raids into the bargain.

I'm implying that all Muslims know a peado or a Jihadi am I? "Carrying on with myself"?
L O fucking L.
Where did I imply that ?!!!


This is exactly what is wrong.
I could complain that it's been implied in this thread I am pro right wing but I won't cos it's plain to see I'm not.
You're jumping to conclusions and making assumptions because some people demand more action from all sides for the sake of the safety of the general public.

Of course people shouldn't interrogate any Muslim they know. Of course police need evidence before a raid. What I'm saying is the powers that be should equip police with whatever they need to go after known suspects. I can't remember the exact figure but police have about 3000 Muslims either on a list suspected or known to be Jihadi's but it takes something like 60 officers to follow their movement 24/7 7 days a week. That's for just 1 suspect. I'd imagine if they could they'd put the ones who'd had a fortnights holiday in Libya and just come back down as a priority.
More Muslims need to stand up and not bury their heads.

Let me make it clear.
I don't give a shit what colour they are or what religion they are but the fact remains IslamIic extremists are responsible for 99% of terror attacks. Let's demand more action from both sides of the fence IE the government and everyday Muslims rather than the liberal and/or media snowflakes just saying "we must be strong".

Neither side have been strong enough IMO.
That's also what I believe Katie Hopkins meant but people are so quick to jump and get offended at the faintest hint of criticism or a phrase used with a connection to an atrocity 70 odd years ago.

Good job Joy Division didn't wait till 2017 to change their name to New Order or they would've been charged with fucking hate crime.


Just wondering if the Hopkins 'Final solution' tweet extends to the owners of our football club.. Would be interesting to hear what her sycophants and apologists think about that.. After all.. Even the thickest of the thickest understands the term 'Final Solution'

Oh yeah mate I fink I doo...

Absolutely ridiculous.

Again, clear evidence of the easily offended mentality.
 
That's also what I believe Katie Hopkins meant but people are so quick to jump and get offended at the faintest hint of criticism or a phrase used with a connection to an atrocity 70 odd years ago.

Are you saying that becaus the Holocust was 70 years ago it has no relevance today?
 
Are you saying that becaus the Holocust was 70 years ago it has no relevance today?

Ffs here we go again.

NO of course not.

But do you not think it's just possible that 70 years later, and although we have remembrance services each year and the unimaginable trauma it caused to thousands of families, that it might just be reasonable to believe that the phrase "final solution" might be used once or twice by people meaning an actual final solution to a very worrying problem?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.