He mentioned a historical case of long term sickness in response to a question about Khayyam Ishaq's trial, this would have placed the occurrence in 2013.
file:///C:/Users/steve/Downloads/poh_11_january_2024.pdf
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Mr Bates vs the Post Office
- Thread starter bluethrunthru
- Start date
file:///C:/Users/steve/Downloads/poh_11_january_2024.pdf
mexico1970
Well-Known Member
Do you think if people were more socially aware "woke" if you like, then the daily grind might be improved?
Rather than watching shite like love island (with product placement of luxury bottled water and plastic surgery adverts).
Not really a left or right thing.
Ohhh I agree, but in reality it's a bit like everyone who owns a car should learn how to change oil etc..
They don't.
I'm in no way defending Sunak or his predecessors but the fact is PM's/MP's level of action is equal to the level of scrutiny by the electorate because that's what keeps them in a job.Sunak has blood on his hands here. I cannot remember him ever mentioning this case at any time, yet within a day of this tv drama airing he is making serious comments about it. Due diligence would mean that prime ministers wouldn’t make commitments on the basis of a tv drama so I would suggest he knew all about this and it was the drama that caused him to do something . He (and his predecessors ) didn’t act based on the Panorama drama, or the court of appeal findings, or the public enquiry, or James Arbuthnot’s findings, etc, he reacted to a tv drama and him and his predecessors are utter cunts for not having sorted this YEARS ago
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
But who better to present the Post Office as the victim and claim it wasn't their fault?If I had been investigated by a Scouser, I would have insisted on a translator being present.
SkyBlueFlux
Well-Known Member
These organisations are a cartel of fraudsters aren't they? These fucking clowns don't seem to realise that these days so much info is available to the public and the shit will land on their doorstep
I like that Labour MP, he seems very capable. Something of a rarity in parliament these days.
BringBackSwales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 33,650
Agree, but why the fuck weren’t the politicians angry, years ago? Apart from James Arbuthnot. Most politicians are cuntsYes apologies, I should have made it clear while I replied to your comment I wasn’t critiquing your perspective, I actually agree with it. Was more just chiming in on the general discussion around the publics role in the story. I agree it has taken a documentary and mass public anger to get things done on this occasion. I’m just saying people should not derive from that the idea that the problem here was the public weren’t angry or aware enough sooner.
In the interest of accuracy it wasn't just Arbnuthnot. David Davis, Paul Scully, Nadhim Zahawi and Andrew Bridgen are others that immediately spring to mind.Agree, but why the fuck weren’t the politicians angry, years ago? Apart from James Arbuthnot. Most politicians are cunts
It's not necessarily my opinion that any of them have never been in the past or are currently "cunts". In fact in my opinion Bridgen is the biggest "****" of all time.
But they were/are all angry about the scandal.
Last edited:
bluemonkey71
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 7,126
Obviously it's a grey area that's often overlooked, to the peril of some. Mostly rendering insurance invalid if a claim need be made.
Interestingly there's a disparity in the time frame insurance companies see as 'spent' and the official, legal requirement of 'spent'.
Not forgetting people went bankrupt so that’s their credit fucked and chances of directorships down the toilet.